IBJNews

Pressure rises on lawmakers to expand Medicaid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Up until now, Gov. Mike Pence and his fellow Republicans in the Legislature have been playing a game of poker with the Obama administration over a potential expansion of Indiana’s Medicaid program. But all of a sudden, Indiana’s hand just got quite a bit weaker.

Pence reiterated last week that he won’t support raising eligibility for the Indiana Medicaid program to 138 percent of the federal poverty limit—unless Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services lets the state use its Healthy Indiana Plan as the vehicle for that expansion.

So far, the feds have given an unofficial “no” to that request.

Since the Supreme Court’s June decision allowed states to opt out of the Medicaid expansion prescribed by Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Indiana leaders have figured they could use that “opt-out” possibility to exact flexibility from the Obama administration.

But in just the past month, Obama’s team has been able to win over three conservative Republican governors—Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder—without making such promises of flexibility.

The governors were concerned that not expanding Medicaid could put some of their states' rural hospitals out of business.

Their support does not guarantee that those states’ legislators will, indeed, vote to expand Medicaid, but it certainly adds momentum to proponents of expansion.

Indiana now is surrounded on all sides by states that have indicated they are likely to expand Medicaid.

“That certainly puts a little bit of pressure on the governor,” said Ed Feigenbaum, publisher of the Indiana Legislative Insight newsletter. “And it gives a little more credibility to the Democrats [who are arguing that Medicaid expansion is] going to be the public policy of the country, and if we want to protect our people and protect our businesses, this is something we need to consider.”

And Medicaid expansion is on the table. This week, Republican legislators in the House and Senate will introduce language into existing bills that would require the state to expand Medicaid—although they likely will reiterate Pence’s call for the state to use the Healthy Indiana Plan to do it.

That plan, created in a bipartisan effort in 2007, expanded health insurance coverage to about 40,000 Hoosiers using health savings accounts to which most recipients are required to contribute at least a small amount.

That feature is the sticking point for the Obama administration, said Seema Verma, a health care consultant who has been the point person on health reform for the state of Indiana.

“It's that we require people to make contributions. That really flies in the face of the entitlement thing,” Verma said during a luncheon speech Friday at a conference on health reform in Indianapolis. The conference was staged by the Center for the Business of Life Sciences at the Indiana University Kelley School of Business.

What’s at stake in the decision is coverage for roughly 300,000 Hoosiers who have incomes below the federal poverty limit yet higher than the income threshold for Indiana’s Medicaid program.

The federal poverty limit is $11,170 for a single adult or $23,050 for a family of four. But Indiana Medicaid does not allow childless adults to enroll in Medicaid unless their incomes are just 25 percent of those limits.

Hospitals are desperately lobbying for the state to expand Medicaid. They agreed with the Obama administration to support cuts in federal payments to hospitals to cover health care for the uninsured, in hopes of receiving more money as the law expanded coverage to an estimated 27 million more Americans.

But since the Medicaid expansion was supposed to achieve about half of that expansion, hospitals face the prospect of reduced payments with only a modest increase in paying customers.

On Monday, the Indiana Hospital Association released a study claiming the Medicaid expansion would add $3.4 billion to Indiana’s economy per year.

But it would come at a cost to the state. A study by the actuarial firm Milliman Inc., produced at the request of former Gov. Mitch Daniels, estimated the Medicaid expansion would cost the state an average of $140 million per year from 2014 to 2020.

Another set of estimates, produced by the Urban Institute, a left-of-center think tank based in Washington, D.C., pegged the cost of expansion at less than $54 million per year.

Feigenbaum said he expects Indiana’s lawmakers to come up with a solution this session that expands Medicaid but in a way that minimizes the cost to the state. And then, like the Legislature did with the Healthy Indiana Plan, they’ll take the risk of getting it approved by the federal government.

“If I had to guess at this point, I would say that there would be an expansion but not in a form that anybody forecasts at this point,” Feigenbaum said. “That we’ll come up with a unique and innovative way of doing it within the rules, that will still help more people but wouldn’t have as deep a fiscal impact.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • of course...
    ...the Republicoins could just admit that THEY have NO answers for the uninsured and under-insured) in this stae/ country and universal, single-payer health care is the BEST answer for all but the for-profit health insurance companies...but since we KNOW the Republicons are OWNED by corporate 'Merka and take their marching orders from their overlords, actual citizens will continue to suffer and die...real 'family values' kinda folks ain't they

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT