Private toll road investors shift financial risk to taxpayers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Companies that build private toll roads are pressing states to assume more financial risk of traffic not meeting expectations, a change that benefits the operators while threatening to increase taxpayer costs.

Illinois and Indiana are among states offering set payments instead of the right to keep toll revenue, the standard financing method in the past. A similar approach is being used in Florida to expand highways in Fort Lauderdale and Orlando, and by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for a bridge to Staten Island.

The new financing arrangement decreases the risk for operators, which include Madrid-based Ferrovial SA and Sydney-based Macquarie Atlas Roads Group, after at least 11 private U.S. toll projects since 1995 have struggled financially due to traffic not meeting projections.

Macquarie and Ferrovial affiliates were involved in the 75-year lease of the Indiana Toll Road in 2006. Their winning bid of $3.85 billion was twice the value that state consultants calculated for the lease. The deal turned out to be a good one for the state, but not necessarily for the companies.

Now, companies are trying to lower the risk.

“We are seeing more of that because investors are a bit skittish about the U.S. market,” said Richard Geddes, director of Cornell University’s Program in Infrastructure Policy in Ithaca, N.Y. “If it’s a new road, there is a lot of risk on how many vans, trucks, motorcycles and other vehicles will end up paying the tolls.”

States are agreeing to make regular payments, often on a monthly or annual basis, provided toll-road operators build and maintain projects according to the contracts they negotiated.

Under the arrangements, states receive toll revenue and have to augment it with money from their operating budgets should traffic fail to generate enough to cover costs. The terms typically call for the states to take over the roads after several decades.

‘Less risky’

There are at least six unannounced toll-road projects under discussion in which states would make fixed payments, said Peter Raymond, U.S. leader of capital projects and infrastructure at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Washington, which consults for companies building the roads.

“For the financial community, it makes it much less risky and less costly,” Raymond said. “It makes it easier for the concessionaires to get the deal done.”

Congress in June agreed to expand loans used mostly to finance toll-road construction. The Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, or TIFIA, which leverages federal money with local spending, was increased to $1 billion a year from $122 million.

Over-optimistic projections

Private toll roads were common in the U.S. in the 1800s, and most of them were eventually taken over by the government or shut down. For much of the past century, states and regional agencies built toll roads by selling tax-exempt bonds.

As road funding diminished and lawmakers objected to raising taxes, governments began searching for ways to finance roads.

The first private road in modern years, called the Dulles Greenway, opened in 1995 in the Virginia suburbs of Washington. Initial traffic on the 14-mile Greenway was less than forecast, forcing a refinancing in 1999.

Other privately backed roads in California, Colorado Illinois, Indiana, South Carolina, Virginia and Texas have had bankruptcies, restructurings, credit downgrades or less traffic than projected. In some cases, anticipated development near the roads didn’t materialize.

Thirty-three states allow private ownership of highways, according to the Denver-based National Conference of State Legislatures.

Vehicle forecasts done by consultants for states and investors have long proven overly optimistic. The first-year revenue of 26 public and private toll roads that opened between 1986 and 2004 averaged one-third less than projected, according to a 2009 analysis of federal data by Robert Bain, a transportation consultant.

Less travel

“You never see a consulting report be negative or else they won’t be able to sell the bonds,” said Howard Cure, managing director of municipal bond research at Evercore Wealth Management LLC in New York.

Inflated projections are coinciding with a decline in U.S. driving. U.S. miles traveled peaked in 2007 with 3.03 trillion, and then declined 2.5 percent through 2012, according to the Federal Highway Administration.

The operator of the southern leg of State Highway 130, a toll road near Austin, Texas, had the credit rating on $1.18 billion of its bank and U.S. government debt cut in October to the third-lowest junk level after missing initial revenue forecasts by 55 percent since opening in 2012. Moody’s Investors Service said there is a “high likelihood” of a payment default next year.

Texas project

A unit of Ferrovial is the majority owner of the Texas project. The company, and other private investors, who won leases through bidding, bet toll revenues would exceed costs.

States face tough decisions over whether to lock into long- term obligations given the history of private toll roads, said Gabriel Roth, a retired traffic consultant who has worked for the World Bank as a transportation economist.

“It’s a very good idea to have private people provide roads, but the condition in which the state pays up if there is no traffic is a disaster,” Roth said.

TIFIA loans to private road operators offer below-market rates -- 3.87 percent as of Nov. 22 -- with 35-year terms and deferred payments. The deals often include an equity investment, bank loans and bonds issued through state public finance agencies.

Florida roads

In Florida, the state agreed in 2009 to pay private investors $66 million annually over 30 years for redesigning an interstate near Fort Lauderdale and adding toll lanes. The investors are also receiving initial payments of as much as $686 million linked to completing the project on time. Florida plans to use toll revenue and its annual transportation budget to make the payments.

Florida could not have finished the project until the late 2020s without private investment from Madrid-based Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA, and TIAA-CREF, a New York-based retirement-plan investment manager, said Paul Lampley, a construction project manager for the Florida Department of Transportation. The toll lanes are scheduled to open in March.

Using a private partner could inflate costs by $13 million beyond what it would cost the state to complete the project, or result in savings of as much as $244 million, depending on which financial assumptions are used, according to the Florida Transportation Department.

Illiana Expressway

“With the financial crisis going on in 2008 and 2009, this structure made the deal close, despite all the turmoil,” said Leon Corbett, project finance manager at the Florida Transportation Department. Investors overwhelmingly supported receiving fixed payments rather than take on more risk tied to toll revenue, he said.

Illinois and Indiana want private investors to build a new toll road through farmland about 45 miles south of downtown Chicago.

Governors Pat Quinn of Illinois, a Democrat, and Republican Mike Pence of Indiana, say the road, called the Illiana Expressway, would boost economic growth and relieve traffic congestion in Chicago’s south suburbs and northern Indiana.

The two states sought investors to accept toll revenue generated by the road. Investors instead insisted the states provide fixed payments over several decades, regardless of how much traffic the road attracts, according to two people whose employers are involved in the negotiations. Both asked not to be named because the discussions were private.

Illinois deal

Paris Ervin, a spokeswoman for the Illinois Transportation Department, didn’t respond to questions about investors’ demands for fixed payments. Will Wingfield, a spokesman for the Indiana Transportation Department, said the state received feedback from toll-road operators and declined to comment on what they said.

Illinois is offering potential bidders as much as $200 million in upfront payments, and both states say they will make fixed payments for 35 years. The road is forecast to cost $1.3 billion to build with the states spending as much as $360 million for land and engineering.

Toll revenues will be sufficient to cover payments to a private operator, said Ervin. The states haven’t said how much the fixed payments will total.

Illiana’s tolls won’t cover its costs for many years, if ever, because the road won’t save truckers enough time to merit detours from nearby Interstate 80, said Robert Poole, director of transportation policy at the Reason Foundation, a free-market research group in Los Angeles. He said he based his view on publications he has read about the road.

Some states, like Texas, don’t allow fixed payments to private toll-road operators. State lawmakers rejected a bill this year to make that possible.

“I’ve spent time over the past decade trying to build a firewall between taxpayers and these types of investments,” said Lois Kolkhorst, a Republican state representative in Texas, who led opposition to allowing the state make fixed payments for toll roads. “Don’t make taxpayers pay for mistakes.”


  • But wait a minute...
    If we're taking away 100% of their risk, we should be getting a much higher fee from the concessionaires for the right to have the highway under their control in the first place. Such boondoggles almost always go sideways for municipalities... One need look no further than our neighbor Chicago's botched parking meter deal to understand the folly. The upfront cash fundamentally changed a culture of street festivals and fairs which have been part of Chicago for hundreds of years. Now those festivals must pay a fee to the parking meter operator for the privilege of shutting down the public street. THAT is obscene.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!