IBJNews

Proposed Indiana reservoir would face several reviews

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal to build a 2,000-acre reservoir about 50 miles northeast of Indianapolis would face numerous reviews by regulatory agencies before the project could move forward.

Indiana's Department of Homeland Security and several divisions of the state Department of Natural Resources would have to review the proposal, as would the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Herald Bulletin of Anderson reported.

But first, elected leaders in Madison and Delaware counties and the communities of Anderson, Chesterfield and Daleville would have to agree to form a 10-member Mounds Lake Commission to study the idea.

The project that would involve building a 2,500-foot-long earthen dam along the White River at a cost of between $300 million and $400 million. Economic development leaders think the reservoir could provide an economic boost to the area.

The dam would be built just east of East Lynn and 18th Streets in Anderson, backing water up in Delaware County to around County Road 300 South and South High Banks Road.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Economy is coming back
    Suddenly lakefront luxury home sites are needed in the ever-expanding Northeast Corridor. I agree with "red dog" and propose a well vetted research group to review every transaction for land sales and purchases dating back sixty (60) years. Perhaps a lottery for the best picks of greed driven politicians.
  • Old Project?
    This was studied in the 1960's as a reservoir site, not sure of dam location then, and if memory serves me, it was deemed not worth the effort back then. Would be too shallow in Delaware Co., long and skinny, and it had some other sand seam issues, etc. for holding the water level up? For Dave in Indy, the SR 32 frontage may be the ideal locations for personal home frontage, high and dry. Look at Google Earth, very narrow through Anderson, so many of those exisiting lots look like they would have back yard frontage. 69 does dip down over the river,so who knows, more new bridges? I like the fact that Homeland Security gets a say?...what would they possibly add to the review?....illegals swimming across county lines?
  • Environmental impacts to also be considered?
    Would an environmental impact statement also be required? There would be significant impacts and the project's proponents should commission a comprehensive study of the full range of impacts. Today's IBJ report about the problems of Centre Properties' River Place project in Fishers, which was litigated for eight years over concerns about whether the Department of Natural Resources properly evaluated the effects of the filling of White River's floodway, serves to timely remind about the importance of doing a complete and honest evaluation of impact.
  • reddog
    I agree with reddog about collusion and profiteering. For such projercts, in a perfect world full of good intentions and good / honest folks - I would perfer that the folks who gave up their castles, through Eminent Domain, would become stakeholders and get their piece of the pie, when it came time to make $ off the project. Otherwise, it becomes a rob from the poor to make others wealthy. I do see the need as a method of flood control. Another problem would be rebuilding of many bridges (I-69, State road 9) and the possible relocation of SR 32, North of Daleville.
  • Water$$$$
    Time to get ethics / non collusion docs signed now. Wonder if proposers (legislatures) own or have options on much of the land that would be shoreline. I see vast greed out of this....just saying.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT