IBJNews

Prosecutors want to keep $3.4M from El Rodeo raids

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Prosecutors have filed lawsuits seeking to keep more than $3.4 million seized during police raids last fall at about two dozen Mexican restaurants across Indiana.

Civil forfeiture lawsuits have been filed in Tippecanoe and Marion counties, accusing the restaurant owners and others involved with the businesses of illegally obtaining the money.

The Tippecanoe County lawsuit accuses at least 25 restaurants of carrying out offenses including money laundering and falsifying tax documents. It doesn't detail the allegations.

No criminal charges have been filed stemming from the November raids and the investigation continues, Tippecanoe County Prosecutor Pat Harrington told the Journal & Courier.

The raids involved several El Rodeo restaurants in the Lafayette, Indianapolis and Richmond areas, along with restaurants under the El Jaripeo, Los Toros or La Carreta names around Indianapolis, northwestern Indiana and Vincennes in southwestern Indiana.

The Associated Press left a message Wednesday seeking comment from Richard Kiefer, an Indianapolis attorney for the restaurants.

Jose Bustos, manager of the El Rodeo restaurant in West Lafayette, is named as one of the individual defendants. He said he wasn't aware the lawsuits had been filed.

"I don't have any comments right now because our lawyers are still working on it. They don't tell us anything," Bustos told the Journal & Courier.

State Attorney General Greg Zoeller said that to win the civil forfeiture case, prosecutors must prove that the money was obtained illegally.

"The object of civil forfeiture is to take away the ill-gotten gains and put [the assets] into the criminal justice system," he said.

The lawsuit also asks that the defendants be ordered to give up any interests in the named restaurants and that the owners be prevented from reorganizing their businesses.

The suit seeks the revocation of any professional licenses the defendants obtained from the state.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Follow the Law
    There is some question whether the civil forfeiture law is even constitutional as Indiana's constitution says that the Common School Fund will be made up of ALL forfeitures. Nonetheless, even if it is, the law says law enforcement can only keep civil forfeiture proceeds to offset costs of the action and the rest is supposed to go to the Common School Fund. From my research, the Tippecanoe County Prosecutor was one of those not turning over the money. Same with the Marion County Prosecutors and virtually every county prosecutor in the state. They're simply pocketing 100% for themselves and the law enforcement agencies in their county. It's a shame that people who take an oath to uphold the law and the Constitution are so willing to violate it.
  • Countersue
    Sounds like the prosecutors were targeting latino businesses. I'd consider a 1983 counter action if I was their attorney.
  • Civil forfeiture abuse
    Civil forfeiture laws are routinely abused in this state. Don't know what's going on with El Rodeo, but money and property can be seized before a criminal case is even filed. Google it and see how the laws enrich police departments and even private attorneys.
  • *
    By filing a lawsuit - which they did.
    • How..
      How can you take and keep money if charges haven't been filed ??

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

      2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

      3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

      4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

      5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

      ADVERTISEMENT