IBJNews

Prospective GM plant buyer pleads case in advertisement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

While local United Auto Wokers declared victory over an attempt to shift their work to a new owner, JD Norman Industries Inc. is making it clear that it hasn't given up on its plan to buy the General Motors Co. stamping plant southwest of downtown Indianapolis.

The Addison, Ill.-based company placed a full-page advertisement in Tuesday’s edition of The Indianapolis Star explaining its plan to buy the plant, which is slated for closure next year unless it can be sold.

GM is trying to sell the plant to JD Norman, but hasn't received cooperation from UAW Local 23, which represents 631 workers at the plant. Union members voted 384-22 on May 26 not to open contract negotiations with Norman. Despite the initial vote, higher-level UAW officials continued to work with JD Norman and GM to come up with a proposal the rank-and-file might accept.

Union members were expected to hear about the proposed five-year contract over the weekend, but members of Local 23 shouted down the union's international representatives at the Sunday afternoon meeting. The meeting ended abruptly, and plans to hold a vote Monday were canceled.

Union members dislike the plan because it cuts base wages from $29 per hour to $15.50. Union reps say local members would rather see the plant close in the hopes that they'll be transferred to other GM plants.

JD Norman's advertisement highlighted one option under the proposed contract that would allow union members to stay with General Motors Corp. and retain their transfer rights.

“While I understand the sentiment of those employees who would rather transfer to another GM plant, our proposal would guarantee their GM transfer rights without having to close the facility,” said the ad, which was signed by JD Norman President and CEO Justin Norman. “Why then would any employees want to see the plant close?"

UAW Local 23 member Donny Jones said it's not enough to allow some members to transfer.

“If they leave the plant open, there's no work to go to. That's the issue.”

It appears Norman can't buy the plant and use it to supply parts to GM without the UAW's approval. The UAW's current agreement prevents GM from outsourcing the work at the plant to a non-union business.

“He's welcome to buy the building, but not the business,” Jones said.

Bargaining Committee Chairman Greg Clark said he received congratulations from UAW members around the country for stopping the proposed wage cuts.

“We would have been the lead domino,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dave in Indy
    I can still hear the bragging from a friend and UAW employee about how he constantly had someone clock him in and out even if he was on "vacation", how he slept on shift when he was there, how he never missed a televised ball game because of the hidden tv at the plant, how he had cookouts on the roof during his shift, how he paid UAW hiring officals to get his family hired, that he made practically $100 bucks an hour and worked seven days a week and how much money he won every day playing "tonk" while tending to his millright job... Well folks now it payback time.
  • GM is not broke
    GM will have multi-billion dollar profit this year. They cleaned up their balance sheet via bankruptcy process, so they are not broke at all. Maybe these jobs are not worth $29 for them to be able to compete with Koreans and Chinese, but I understand these workers as well. They see the company making money after they had to make some concessions, and they don't want to give in. GM had no shame to basically wipe out their shareholders, erase their debt by not paying their bondholders and then taking government loans, so why would this workers act aginst their self-interest?
  • $15.50 sounds lucrative in todays job market
    Ok J.D. Norman, go ahead and buy the facility, contract with whatever companies that need metal stamping services and I will work for you @ $15.50 hourly.
    Maybe I should mention that I have some College, 30 years experience in machine maintenance/repair and was always considered very good at taking care of issues in a timely manner.
    No need for many fringe benefits at this time but would appreciate armed security to and from work to protect me from those jobless folks that refused to listen to their national union.
  • wake up
    its like this if we let j.d.norman take over and we take his pay cut then we screw every brother and sister in gm gm then will go after all gm plants for wage cuts and the there is the outsourcing that will go on just remember people at toyota makes more than 15.50 hr
  • Daves Right
    If they take Normans deal, then there will be no need for GM to transfer these people to another Stamping Plant!
  • IQ draining
    I feel dumber everytime I read about this issue. Most of the employees will be working in another GM plant very soon anyway so what do they care. We stood our ground! Really for what?! Maybe you don't think you can live on 15 bucks an hour but you can! And who says it will stay that way, union contracts are about as solid as NFL contracts these days. Quit buying the Harleys, Boats,Caddy's and Stuff you don't need and SUCK IT UP! And don't sell the "can you afford a 50% cut" speech. Most people are not making 60 grand plus a year($29.50/HR)doing work that can be trained in a limited time.
  • $0/hr
    If the market could bare to pay $29/hr, than GM wouldn't be closing the plant. You may not like $15 but thats what the market says your labor is worth. Better than $0/hr. What do politicians have to do with this? Govt doesnt save jobs, their meddling cost jobs. It should be obvious by now.
  • PLEASE THINK THIS THRU....
    $15 AN HOUR IS UNREALISTIC AFTER TAXES, MEDICAL INSURANCE, 401K OR IRA CONTRIBUTION, MORTGAGE PAYMENT, PUTTING FOOD ON THE TABLE, TRANSPORTATION ETC...IT SEEMS IN THE LONG RUN MORE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE WILL BE NEEDED, FURTHER PUTTING A BURDEN ON EVERYONE ELSE. WHEN PEOPLE MAKE GOOD WAGES AND BENEFITS THEY CAN SUSTAIN THEIRSELVES AND PUT MONEY BACK INTO THE LOCAL ECONOMY. MY WISH IS THAT ALL POLITICIANS WOULD COMPREHEND THIS.
  • typical union mentality
    Dave in Indy - You still don't get it! If your employer gets rich, you get pay raises and he hires more employees. When your employer is poor (like GM), you loose your job. Everyone benefits when your employer does well! Can't you union guys understand the basics? You deserve to be unemployed.
  • Rakes reeks
    It also reeks of funny business, LOL.
  • I'm not a union fat, but....
    I have never been a fan of Unions but, this rakes of "funny business." $15 an hour sounds about right for a new employee but not a skilled employee. The UAW "high level folks" seem to have some kind of incentive in this and it's not about the workforce. Wonder who is getting their palms greased, here? Can you afford a 50% pay cut, especially when there is a good chance you can go to another worksite and make the same $29 hour? Why would you take a cut, just to make someone else stinking rich?
  • And they STILL don't get it
    Those jobs will be GONE FOREVER if this deal fails - GM can, and will, get around the "mo outsourcing" by opening a plant in Guatemala, and pay those workers $29.90 / DAY - and 631 more Hoosiers who seem to be dumber than a box of rocks will be OUT OF WORK. Period. Dot. Then maybe Norman will buy the plant and make parts for Toyota...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT