IBJNews

Pulliam trust plans to boost giving for environment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust plans to shift a significant part of its philanthropy efforts to conservation and animal welfare causes, starting with a $1 million gift to Marian University's EcoLab announced Thursday morning.

The gift will establish an endowment to support programs and staffing for the university's 55-acre outdoor classroom near the White River. 

The $343 million Pulliam trust has been a major source of grants to social-service organizations, which received 80 percent of the trust's $11.1 million in donations in 2010.

Going forward, 25 percent to 35 percent of the budget will go to conservation and animals, said Michael Twyman, director of grant programs in Indiana. (The trust divides its grant-making activities between Indiana and Arizona.) In social services, the trust will narrow its focus to programs that promote "self-sufficiency," so some groups that have received grants in the past will no longer be eligible, he said.

The Pulliam trust expects to give away about $14 million next year.

“Protecting animals and nature” has always been part of the trust’s mission, but it accounted for a relatively small portion of grants—$1.9 million, or 17 percent, in 2010.

Twyman said the trustees decided to shift their giving strategy after reviewing past practices in light of the stated three-prong mission. Plus, Twyman said, "Mrs. Pulliam’s love for animals and nature is more obvious and closer to the heart of the benefactors than anything else.”

Pulliam, who died in 1997, was a journalist and businesswoman who married Indianapolis Star and Indianapolis News publisher Eugene Pulliam. She was the founding secretary-treasurer and a director of Central Newspapers Inc.

The $1 million grant to Marian is one of the largest gifts the trust has made to a single organization, and Marian University will rename the EcoLab the Nina Mason Pulliam EcoLab.

Marian is looking to raise $5 million in all for the EcoLab endowment.

The EcoLab site was originally a landscape designed for the Allison estate known as Riverdale. Marian restored natural habitats, including wetlands, for its own academic programs and opened the area to local schools and teachers. The Pulliam trust previously gave $250,000 for the EcoLab's creation.

"Through a shared vision of what an ecology laboratory on a university campus can do to advance environmental stewardship, research, and quality science education, the trust and Marian University is leading the way in creating a model of national significance,” Marian President Dan Elsener said in a press release.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What about a grant reflecting journalism? Or Pulliam past paternalism policies?
    Why the big void, total absence of any grant to a) the field of Journalism --from whence all this largesse came about? Or a perhaps philanthropic paternalistic grant which would reflect senior Pulliam family's long ago imbedded concern for its family of Hoosier journalists--like longtime loyal Star writer Bonnie Britton now a hospitalized stroke victim who has "used up" her insurance and is being deprived of vital physical therapy in a local facility because her insurance has run out? Loyal Star former co-workers who visit her report there is no go on needed therapy because there is no dough left--Papa Pulliam, for all his negative journalistic policies, and son "young Gene" would never have allowed a longtime staff member like Bonnie to be tossed onto the trash heap of uncared for stroke victims--where is there any concern for the field of journalism or its workers in these otherwise laudable grants? Or, where are the past Pulliams who may have inherited the nepotism gene-or not? Just curious since newspapering pays lip service to Peter Zenger a group of past Hoosier journalists cannot resist this "zinger."

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT