IBJNews

Pulliam trust plans to boost giving for environment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust plans to shift a significant part of its philanthropy efforts to conservation and animal welfare causes, starting with a $1 million gift to Marian University's EcoLab announced Thursday morning.

The gift will establish an endowment to support programs and staffing for the university's 55-acre outdoor classroom near the White River. 

The $343 million Pulliam trust has been a major source of grants to social-service organizations, which received 80 percent of the trust's $11.1 million in donations in 2010.

Going forward, 25 percent to 35 percent of the budget will go to conservation and animals, said Michael Twyman, director of grant programs in Indiana. (The trust divides its grant-making activities between Indiana and Arizona.) In social services, the trust will narrow its focus to programs that promote "self-sufficiency," so some groups that have received grants in the past will no longer be eligible, he said.

The Pulliam trust expects to give away about $14 million next year.

“Protecting animals and nature” has always been part of the trust’s mission, but it accounted for a relatively small portion of grants—$1.9 million, or 17 percent, in 2010.

Twyman said the trustees decided to shift their giving strategy after reviewing past practices in light of the stated three-prong mission. Plus, Twyman said, "Mrs. Pulliam’s love for animals and nature is more obvious and closer to the heart of the benefactors than anything else.”

Pulliam, who died in 1997, was a journalist and businesswoman who married Indianapolis Star and Indianapolis News publisher Eugene Pulliam. She was the founding secretary-treasurer and a director of Central Newspapers Inc.

The $1 million grant to Marian is one of the largest gifts the trust has made to a single organization, and Marian University will rename the EcoLab the Nina Mason Pulliam EcoLab.

Marian is looking to raise $5 million in all for the EcoLab endowment.

The EcoLab site was originally a landscape designed for the Allison estate known as Riverdale. Marian restored natural habitats, including wetlands, for its own academic programs and opened the area to local schools and teachers. The Pulliam trust previously gave $250,000 for the EcoLab's creation.

"Through a shared vision of what an ecology laboratory on a university campus can do to advance environmental stewardship, research, and quality science education, the trust and Marian University is leading the way in creating a model of national significance,” Marian President Dan Elsener said in a press release.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What about a grant reflecting journalism? Or Pulliam past paternalism policies?
    Why the big void, total absence of any grant to a) the field of Journalism --from whence all this largesse came about? Or a perhaps philanthropic paternalistic grant which would reflect senior Pulliam family's long ago imbedded concern for its family of Hoosier journalists--like longtime loyal Star writer Bonnie Britton now a hospitalized stroke victim who has "used up" her insurance and is being deprived of vital physical therapy in a local facility because her insurance has run out? Loyal Star former co-workers who visit her report there is no go on needed therapy because there is no dough left--Papa Pulliam, for all his negative journalistic policies, and son "young Gene" would never have allowed a longtime staff member like Bonnie to be tossed onto the trash heap of uncared for stroke victims--where is there any concern for the field of journalism or its workers in these otherwise laudable grants? Or, where are the past Pulliams who may have inherited the nepotism gene-or not? Just curious since newspapering pays lip service to Peter Zenger a group of past Hoosier journalists cannot resist this "zinger."

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT