IBJNews

Q&A: Don Stumpp

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Executive Q & A

Don Stumpp, manager of payer contracting at Indianapolis-based physician group American Health Network and president of the Indiana Medical Group Management Association, discussed the impact of the health care reform law on primary-care physicians as well as the near-constant threat of a sharp cut in Medicare reimbursement.

IBJ: Congress is working this week to pass a delay to the implementation of the Medicare sustainable-growth-rate formula (SGR) to put off a 21-percent cut in physician payments. However, throughout this year, Congress has passed only 30- and 60-day delays. What has the been the impact on AHN's practices of having this potential cut looming so frequently?

A: It has been distracting. This happens every year, so we’re used to it. Everybody understands what happens. Physicians will want to know, what should I do: Should I stop taking Medicare patients, should I limit them, what do I have the right to do? In our group, there will be docs that come and ask this. Depending on what they’re thinking, they get a little more agitated and want to do something about it. But we’ve always operated under the assumption that it will get fixed.

IBJ: What would happen if the Medicare cuts went into effect? What would that force American Health Network physicians to do?

A: It seems impossible to think about what would happen. And it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen this year. Physicians would not just drop patients. They can limit their Medicare patients. Just like any business, you would start selling your services to higher payers. Access would be a problem to Medicare patients.

IBJ: How will primary-care physicians, which make up most of American Health Networks's practices, fare under the new Medicare fee schedules and the boost in primary-care Medicaid payments in the health reform law? Are these improvements significant enough to redress much of the disparity between primary-care docs and specialists?

A: It certainly does go a long way. Because the primary-care doctor relies on the office visit and [getting paid] for their cognitive skills in that office visit to ultimately keep the patient from (unnecessarily) using more health care services. Coupled with the medical home and the accountable-care organizations [two new programs created by the health reform law], primary care is going to be the front person for that. There’s clearly going to be more of a focus on them.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT