IBJNews

Q&A: Don Stumpp

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Executive Q & A

Don Stumpp, manager of payer contracting at Indianapolis-based physician group American Health Network and president of the Indiana Medical Group Management Association, discussed the impact of the health care reform law on primary-care physicians as well as the near-constant threat of a sharp cut in Medicare reimbursement.

IBJ: Congress is working this week to pass a delay to the implementation of the Medicare sustainable-growth-rate formula (SGR) to put off a 21-percent cut in physician payments. However, throughout this year, Congress has passed only 30- and 60-day delays. What has the been the impact on AHN's practices of having this potential cut looming so frequently?

A: It has been distracting. This happens every year, so we’re used to it. Everybody understands what happens. Physicians will want to know, what should I do: Should I stop taking Medicare patients, should I limit them, what do I have the right to do? In our group, there will be docs that come and ask this. Depending on what they’re thinking, they get a little more agitated and want to do something about it. But we’ve always operated under the assumption that it will get fixed.

IBJ: What would happen if the Medicare cuts went into effect? What would that force American Health Network physicians to do?

A: It seems impossible to think about what would happen. And it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen this year. Physicians would not just drop patients. They can limit their Medicare patients. Just like any business, you would start selling your services to higher payers. Access would be a problem to Medicare patients.

IBJ: How will primary-care physicians, which make up most of American Health Networks's practices, fare under the new Medicare fee schedules and the boost in primary-care Medicaid payments in the health reform law? Are these improvements significant enough to redress much of the disparity between primary-care docs and specialists?

A: It certainly does go a long way. Because the primary-care doctor relies on the office visit and [getting paid] for their cognitive skills in that office visit to ultimately keep the patient from (unnecessarily) using more health care services. Coupled with the medical home and the accountable-care organizations [two new programs created by the health reform law], primary care is going to be the front person for that. There’s clearly going to be more of a focus on them.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT