IBJNews

Q&A

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Dave Reed is president of the Healthcare Business Solutions group inside Bloomington-based Cook Medical Inc. Since 2007, his team of 18 full-time people—aided by about 60 others throughout Cook’s organization—has worked with hospital systems, distributors of medical products, and group purchasing organizations to improve the efficiency of the business side of health care and to make sure new products contribute to that efficiency, as well as solving unmet medical needs.

IBJ: Why is Cook spending so much time trying to help hospitals be more efficient/effective?

A: For our 50 years of history, we have heavily been focused on the clinical side: nurses, physicians, clinicians, folks that touch the patient and serve the patient at the bedside. But as the complexity of health care gets greater, we felt that it’s in Cook’s best interest to try to understand and work towards an alignment between Cook and the health care services on the business side. … By ensuring that health care is delivered in a cost-effective way, so that the maximum number of patients can be served with every dollar possible, then it’s in our interest to align in new or better ways.

IBJ: On Jan. 1, a group of hospitals and medical device companies, including Cook, switched to a new system of product standardization called GS1. Describe that standardization effort and how you think it will help hospitals.

A: About 10 years ago, we said, "We want to go to a unified system that we can manage within our organization, that we can kind of push externally." The GS1 was the one standard at the time that allowed us to do that in a unified way. The GS1 standard has been used in many other industries, so we know that it works. There are a number of benefits to that. When a health system is receiving boxes of products, to be able to scan a barcode that says, this is what you have, is a lot easier than opening boxes and counting. So now the health system knows what they have in an electronic format. If you get to the point where you’re trying to manage efficiently and effectively your entire inventory, it allows you to have that capability. In the event of doing a recall, for a health system, they now can know where that product is. And payment for health care is being squeezed so much, that you want to be able to reduce costs wherever you can.

IBJ: Can you name one or two examples of how Cook’s Healthcare Business Solutions group is trying to help hospitals?

A: Sometimes it’s in the simple basic elements that most people don’t think about. How many times a day do you place an order from one of your suppliers? Every one of those processes adds costs. It can be as simple as reducing the number of times a health care customer orders. In our industry, it’s almost been a just-in-time mechanism. That has been the normal way. Air shipping a product so that it arrives the next day. That is significantly more costly than shipping it ground and having it arrive three days later. That is significantly less costly. But being able to manage an inventory, that is efficient and effective that still allows you to do the procedures at the bedside that you need, that is one the things that we have helped hospitals do.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT