IBJNews

Q&A

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Don Kelso is executive director of the Indiana Rural Health Association. The trade group is trying to help its members navigate the changes coming from health care reform and the financial pressures being created by federal budget cuts. The association recently launched a service for its members called SuiteStats, which is data-management software to help hospital executives identify areas ripe for cost-cutting.

IBJ: What disadvantages do rural health care providers have now compared with their larger peers in urban areas?
 
A: Reimbursement for hospitals is changing. I think SuiteStats is a fairly good tool as we move to that end. iVantage [the Maine-based company that makes the software], they take the general ledger for the hospitals that they’re working from and download it, so the hospital leadership can look at their data and they can call up a code. Like pneumonia. They can look at a lot of data so they can know the total it took to take care of you and break it down by the various components. Then it compares your hospital to other hospitals that are like you. As you look at these cost data, it points out quality issues. With physicians, it’s hard to make them change, but they do respond to data.
 
IBJ: Is this a way to help them stay independent?
 
A: That, and also the local economics. I live in Washington [where Daviess Community Hospital is located]. If this hospital fails or, for the most part goes away, it’s just going to kill this community financially. Because it’s probably $30 million to $40 million just in payroll. Plus the brain drain. The physicians, they’re some of the most analytical in the community, and they sit on boards and community organizations. If I live here, I may have to go to Bloomington or Evansville to get my appendix taken out.
 
IBJ: In the past five years, many rural hospitals have merged with larger systems because of financial pressures. Do you foresee that merger trend continuing?

A: The larger systems are less likely now to take on these failing rural hospitals, because it’s adding up on their balance sheets. I’m seeing less interest in takeovers now by larger hospitals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT