Quest for new rocket fuel leads scientists to kitchen

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Science, like politics, makes strange bedfellows. At Purdue University, the quest for a new missile and spacecraft fuel has
brought together an oil-and-vinegar mix of rocket scientists and food scientists.

They joined forces to pursue a five-year, $6.4 million project funded by the U.S. Army Research Office to study the "spray
and combustion of gelled hyperbolic propellants." Or, in layman’s terms, how to use gelled rocket fuels (which are easier
to store and handle than liquids) to power everything from missiles to spacecraft.

The stumbling block (well, one of the stumbling blocks) is learning how to burn it efficiently. In particular, making sure
the fuel droplets sprayed into a rocket engine’s combustion chamber are just the right size.

Getting a grip on the droplet issue demanded an eclectic team of experts in mechanical engineering, aeronautics, astronautics,
food science, and agricultural and biological engineering — both at Purdue and at the study’s other participating schools,
Iowa
State University and the University of Massachusetts.

The project needed rocket scientists because they know about rocketry. It needed food science and agricultural experts because
they knew about handling gels, which are used in hundreds of products found on grocery store shelves.

"This is by far the most multidisciplinary team I’ve been associated with," said Stephen Heister, Purdue professor
of aeronautics
and astronautics and the leader of one of the program’s two groups.

"The food science folks are incredibly knowledgeable and are wonderful colleagues to work with. In our application, however,
we are pushing the gels at much higher velocities than one normally would find in a food processing plant. For this reason,
it is an interesting problem for them as well."

The other "interesting" aspect is that food science people don’t normally work with potentially toxic or explosive
compounds.
Still, tapping them for help with propellants isn’t as odd as it might sound. When it comes to processing gel-like compounds
on an industrial scale, they wrote the book.

"Orange marmalade, peanut butter and even mayonnaise can have mechanical properties similar to this rocket fuel,"
said Osvaldo
Campanella, Purdue professor of agricultural and biological engineering. "In fact, we are looking at a material that
has gel-like
mechanical properties when it is stored and more liquid-like characteristics when it is pumped or sprayed."

Much of the work will be done using an inert compound that’s the color and consistency of orange marmalade. Purdue scientists
are experimenting with it at the university’s Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories in the Department of Food Science, and at the
School of Agricultural and Biological Engineering.

One of the key goals is creating a fine spray of uniformly sized droplets that provides the maximum amount of boom
when ignited. To see which spray techniques work best, a test chamber was constructed into which the fake fuel could be injected.
Super-high-speed movies (approximately 10,000 frames per second) capture every nuance of its behavior.

So far, researchers have learned that gelled fuels are far easier to store than they are to actually use, said Paul Sojka,
a Purdue professor of mechanical engineering and an associate director of the project.

"Anyone can form a gelled fuel," Sojka said. "The key question is, ‘What’s the
right consistency?’ This is complicated by the fact that the ‘right’ consistency is probably different when considering fuel-storage
issues, fuel-pumping issues, fuel-injection issues and fuel-burning issues."

In other words,
the perfect gel for, say, storage, probably isn’t the perfect fuel consistency for, say, burning. Which is why it could be
a while before NASA or the Department
of Defense can use this technology.

"It would likely be eight to 10 years before a system could be fielded, as there are many hurdles such as long-term storage
that require substantial time to evaluate," Heister said.

It will be worth the time if the project eventually pans out. Jason Lovell, manager of the state’s Defense Development Division,
said such odd-seeming synergies aren’t that odd at all. It’s all part of the sprawling world of Department of Defense research.

"Almost anything you’d develop for the commercial world can have a defense application," Lovell said. "Or vice
versa."

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In