IBJNews

Real estate brokerage sues IU Health over commissions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the city’s largest commercial real estate brokerages is suing Indiana University Health for failing to pay consulting fees that could top seven figures.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Marion Superior Court by the local office of Los Angeles-based CBRE Inc., accuses the local hospital system of cheating it out of commissions related to several real estate deals in Indianapolis, Lafayette, Frankfort and Mooresville.

Most notable is IU Health’s canceled plan for a $73 million administrative office building at 16th Street and Capitol Avenue, which would have been built near a $120 million neuroscience hub across the street from IU Health's Methodist Hospital campus.

IU Health instead purchased the Gateway Tower plaza at 10th and Illinois streets to house administrative staff. Officials told IBJ in March the price was so good on Gateway Plaza—where the hospital system already rents 130,000 square feet—that they couldn’t refuse.

CBRE doesn’t specify in the complaint how much it believes it should have earned in commissions before IU Health canceled the project. But based on a rate of 2 percent, the amount could be about $1.5 million.

“IU Health reneged on its commitment to compensate CBRE for its years of work toward the IU Health administrative office space consolidation,” CBRE said in its lawsuit. “When CBRE pressed for payment, IU Health ceased communicating with CBRE professionals concerning a variety of projects that were in progress, apparently without informing even its own personnel.”

That CBRE took the drastic step of suing IU Health, one of its largest clients, shows how contentious the once-chummy relationship had become.

CBRE says in the suit that it has provided real estate services to IU Health since the “mid-2000s” and even assisted IU Health with structuring and staffing its corporate real estate department.

Further, CBRE said it has provided services to IU Health both with and without a formal written agreement and, until recently, was always compensated regardless of the arrangement.

“Unfortunately, IU Health has been unresponsive to our repeated requests to resolve this matter amicably,” CBRE said in a written statement to IBJ. “This leaves us with no recourse than to initiate legal action to claim the substantial monies we are owed. We take this step very reluctantly, but IU Health has left us no other alternative.”      

Attorneys for IU Health declined to comment because the ligitation is pending.

CBRE entered into a consulting services agreement in December 2008 with IU Health to develop an administrative master plan, according to the complaint. Directors of IU Health subsequently approved a plan to consolidate administrative services in June 2010.

About the same time, Ryan Kitchell, former director of Indiana’s Office of Management and Budget, joined IU Health as vice president and treasurer, the suit said.

Kitchell asked CBRE for documents detailing the work CBRE was performing for IU Health and requested that the real estate firm perform additional financial analysis.

IU Health ultimately purchased Gateway Plaza, using CBRE’s analysis in negotiating and closing the purchase, according to the suit.
 
“IU Health would be unjustly enriched if it were allowed to accept the benefit of CBRE’s services regarding the consolidation plan and Gateway Plaza transaction without compensating CBRE,” CBRE charged in its suit.

CBRE also alleges that IU Health hasn’t paid a $158,250 commission for a facility it located to consolidate primary care and clinic groups in Mooresville.

In addition, CBRE says IU Health still owes it $85,750 in consulting fees on the IU Health Arnett hospital project in Lafayette, as well as a 1-percent acquisition fee and 1.5-percent developer selection-financing fee.

And, CBRE claims IU Health hasn’t paid it $10,500 for its appraisals of three medical office buildings—two in Lafayette and one in Frankfort.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Shame on IU Health!!!
    Shame on IU Health! It's bad business not to fulfill your obligations. Good for CBRE!
  • Fee Protection
    Good for CBRE to stand up for themselves. Certain other Real Estate companies in this market like to provide professional services for free. Sounds like a sustainable business plan.
  • IU cbre
    It's in poor taste to expose your dirty laundry. Shame on cbre for dragging down a great industry.
    • IU
      interesting article...now everyone will be going after them

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

    ADVERTISEMENT