IBJNews

Regenstrief names new CEO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Regenstrief Institute Inc. will have a new CEO Oct. 1 as Dr. Bill Tierney replaces Dr. Tom Inui.

Inui, who has led the medical research institute since 2002, will remain a Regenstrief rersearcher focused on global health issues.

Tierney, 59, has spent his entire 30-year career at Regenstrief, which developed one of the nation’s first electronic medical record systems and maintains 35 years of patient data from that system.

The Regenstrief database lies behind the Indiana Health Information Exchange, an Indianapolis-based not-for-profit group, which facilitates the swapping of patient records between central Indiana hospitals. It is now trying to expand such record exchanges statewide.

Like most Regenstrief researchers, Dr. Tierney also teaches as the Indiana University School of Medicine and sees patients for Wishard Health Services, where he also acts as chief of medicine.

Tierney also led a team in developing an open-source medical resource system for AIDS clinics IU operates in Kenya. That system, called OpenMRS, is now being used widely in developing nations.

As part of his promotion, the IU School of Medicine has also named Tierney associate dean of clinical effectiveness research, a new position. The appointment still requires the approval of the IU trustees.

In a statement, Tierney said, “Building upon the 35 years of data of the Regenstrief Medical Record System and decades of groundbreaking health services and aging research, the Institute has an enormous opportunity to lead a revolution in healthcare systems and delivery of health care both in the United States and globally.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT