IBJNews

Renewable-energy firm eyeing Tipton County plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A renewable-energy firm is considering manufacturing solar panels in an empty Tipton County plant where transmissions were to be built for Chrysler automobiles, according to the Kokomo Tribune.

Sources told the newspaper that the company is based in the western part of the country and could create up to 800 jobs. A deal hinges on the company’s ability to secure a loan from the U.S. Department of Energy, the sources said.

The Tipton County Commissions, County Council and Redevelopment Commission are scheduled to meet at 7 p.m. Monday to discuss details about a potential deal.

Kenny Ziegler, president of the County Commissioners, told the Tribune he is “optimistic” that the building will be occupied soon.

Tipton County reportedly is one of two locations the renewable-energy firm is considering. The other site could be in Nampa, Idaho, according to Idaho television station KTVB. It reported that a solar-panel firm is exploring a potential location there.

In addition, the Howey Political Report newsletter is reporting on its Web site that Fiat SpA/Chrysler is preparing a bid for the abandoned plant.

Getrag Manufacturing LLC filed for bankruptcy in November and halted work on the plant in Tipton County after its partnership with Chrysler LLC collapsed. A federal bankruptcy court in Detroit turned the facility over to a trustee group consisting of contractors still owed money on the project. The court set a minimum price of $45 million for the property.

The joint venture around a new, fuel-efficient transmission was the sole reason for building the nearly 800,000-square-foot factory at the crossroads of U.S. 31 and State Road 28.

Work on the $530 million project came to a halt last October. The factory is 80-percent complete, and it has taxpayer-financed road and utility service.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT