A potential legislative battle over allowing carryout alcohol sales in Indiana on Sunday likely will center on economics.
Backers of the proposed legislation, which would allow drug, grocery, convenience and liquor stores to sell alcohol on Sunday,
have begun touting a study by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, or DISCUS, estimating that as much as $9
million in additional tax revenue would be generated by the allowance of Sunday sales.
The proposed law also would allow cold beer to be sold at drug, grocery and convenience stores every day of the week. Right
now, only liquor stores are allowed to sell cold beer in Indiana.
Opponents of the move discredit the financial aspects of the study because an industry group produced it and it dates back to 2006, before the sales tax was increased to 7 percent.
Their arguments against the study could get a boost from a new report by Ball State University economic professors that predicts no significant financial impact from allowing Sunday sales.
Members of the campaign for Sunday sales, who pressed an unsuccessful legislative fight last session, are undeterred. They plan to release an updated DISCUS study when the legislative session begins in January. And they hope the dollar figures will resonate with lawmakers grappling with crafting a difficult budget next year.
“In today’s climate where every little bit helps, there’s $9 million to be found not on taxpayers’ backs,” said Matt Norris, director of Hoosiers for Beverage Choices. “It’s been one of the many arguments we’ve used – it takes on added importance this year, given the state’s budget situation.”
The proponents’ study is based on the estimated increased volume in alcohol sales, according to what has occurred in other states that have allowed Sunday sales.
They say business is lost on Sundays because shoppers in border counties take their business to neighboring states, and some consumers who might impulse-buy alcohol on that day at the grocery store don’t go back to purchase it later in the week.
“All of us are time-starved,” said Grant Monahan, president of the Indiana Retail Council. “(Shoppers) want convenience and the ability to purchase alcoholic beverages when they’re doing the rest of their grocery shopping.”
Opponents are expected to push back with equal tenacity. John Livengood, president of the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, said Sunday sales don’t increase overall sales activity, but spread it out over seven days instead of six.
And he worries that allowing Sunday sales would put package liquor stores out of business. Many package stores are family-owned and would likely stay closed on Sundays even if they were allowed to open, he said, thus losing sales to competitors. Those that do open would be hit by the additional expense of doing business an extra day a week.
“Some of our members would end up closing some of their units in order to survive,” Livengood said. “We don’t think it would be helpful to us, and we don’t think it is good public policy to go down the road of deregulation, which is where this would take it.”
The Ball State study, conducted by Michael Hicks and Nalitra Thaiprasert from the school’s Center for Business and
Economic Research, backs up that assertion. They found that allowing Sunday sales could eventually reduce the number of package
liquor stores in Indiana as much as 25 percent.
They also didn’t see indications that people cross over to buy booze in states that sell it on Sundays.
“There’s no evidence that there’s an increase in overall sales,” Hicks said. “What this suggests is people are substituting where they buy booze.”
The argument will continue in coming weeks as proponents kick up their campaign to prepare for the legislative session.

















IBJ Conversations
20 Comments
Add Comment
I believe the 3-way liqour licencse that you are referring to are for bars/restaurants, not retail stores. The assumption is the licensing requirements would be identical for both grocery stores and liquor stores. A lot of grocery stores now sell hard liquor, so I assume they already have the same license, so I think your point is moot.
And I want to buy alcohol when i want to buy it without restrictions on the day of the week. There shouldn't even need to be a justification for taking away this law. It's ridiculous. 47 other states people. 47 other states don't have this law and they get on just fine. Geesh.
People saying that you just just plan ahead and make your purchases the day before miss the point...there is no reason for this law to be on the books.
Also, People hate Wal-Mart. It is a horrible experience. The people who spend money on alcohol are picky about their drinks. Wal Mart isn't localized enough to keep up with the demands of the connoisseur. When was the last time you shopped at Wal-Mart for a single malt scotch, a nice malbec, or a specialty beer?
I guess the lesson is, if you own a LQ and you are worried about free market competition.... SPECIALIZE. Find a target market that hates wal-mart. I know your business might have to change, but thats the nature of competition. Move forward or get left behind. Do you want to be the one who fails? Just because your business is running fine right now it doesn't entitle you to endless easy sailing. Get better at what you do, in the end it is better for everyone. If you can't do it any better then you can no longer compete and it is better for society if you do something that you are good at. There is no reason that society should bend to keep any system inefficient. Optimize the competition and you optimize the benefit to society.
1. we allow all stores to sell alcohol on sundays, AND
2. we keep the restriction in place that only "liquor stores" can sell cold beer?
Is this too easy of a compromise, or am I missing something? The big-box stores are trying to add-in a benefit for themselves with cold beer sales for all, and now the consumers will suffer with no change when half of this bill should easily pass.
1. we allow all stores to sell alcohol on sundays, AND
2. we keep the restriction in place that only "liquor stores" can sell cold beer?
Is this too easy of a compromise, or am I missing something? The big-box stores are trying to add-in a benefit for themselves with cold beer sales for all, and now the consumers will suffer with no change when half of this bill should easily pass.
I do agree with you that the law is here to protect not only the interest of liquor store owners but also fill the coffers of the state.
My point is:
After charging up to $400 000 for a permit to a liquor store owner, is it fair for the state to allow the wal-marts of the world
to receive such a permit for a nominal fee?
i am a capitalist at heart, but what fair is fair.
Charge the wal-marts the same fee!
I'll bet they will not go for it!!!!
the only fair answer is for the state to reinbourse the liquor store owners for the cost of their licences!
And, after it is done, let the competition do what it is suppose to do!!!
Today's "protection" for liquor stores is the exclusive right to sell cold beer and be closed on Sunday.
If the state decide to remove this "protection" by cold beer sales anywhere and Sunday sales,will the liquor store owners ask for their money back?
Or will the state charge the Wall-Marts of the world these stupid amount of money for the "right" of selling cold beer and Sunday sales?
i am curious to hear from the experts!!!!
But even if we assume that the study is correct, that consumption will increase with Sunday sales, is that what we want? Are we really willing to accept that more alcohol consumption will not take a greater toll on state resources in other areas?
Convenience? I know a lot of drinkers who do as I do -- if you need extra booze for Sunday, you just buy it on Saturday.