IBJNews

Report backs simpler Indiana local tax system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new report on Indiana's local income taxes urges state legislators to simplify a system that has seven types of taxes and a two-year lag before the money collected by the state is distributed to local governments.

The Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute report released Monday finds that the local income taxes have successfully lowered property taxes throughout the state since they were started in the 1970s, but that the system has steadily become more complicated, The Times of Munster and The Journal Gazette reported.

"One of the stress points is just the complexity," said Matt Nagle, an analyst at Indiana University's Public Policy Institute, a co-sponsor of the report. "Property tax caps were meant to introduce more simplicity, transparency and consistency and the conversation should be, 'Is there a way we can introduce that simplicity on the (local income tax) side as well?'"

Northwestern Indiana's Lake County is the only one of the state's 92 counties without a local income tax, which range from 0.1 percent to 3.13 percent.

The report found most local income taxes are used to reduce property taxes, though counties are increasingly using local income tax revenue for other expenses.

State lawmakers in recent years have allowed counties to also adopt local income taxes for purposes such as public safety, corrections facilities and economic development.

"Local income taxes are a central piece of local government budgets, but taxpayers should have a level of certainty and clarity in how these taxes are administered," said John Ketzenberger, president of the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research group.

The report said $1.5 billion in revenue from local income taxes was distributed in 2012 to counties, and that additional $2.4 billion could have been collected if all counties used the maximum rates of between 3 percent and 3.5 percent, depending on the combination used by a county.

Nagle acknowledged it wouldn't be politically possible for all counties to adopt maximum rates. He also said that income tax collections continue to be less stable than property taxes during economic downturns.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT