IBJNews

Republic Airways charts rebound for small jet unit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Frontier Airlines owner Republic Airways Holdings Inc. has been busy whipping the Denver-based airline closer to profitability for the past three years.

But Republic next plans to focus its turnaround efforts on its Chautauqua Airlines unit, a once-profitable fleet of 50-seat jets that has been battered by changing industry economics.

By year’s end, Indianapolis-based Republic wants to wring $40 million to $60 million in annual economic improvements from Chautauqua. Founded 39 years ago in Jamestown, N.Y., Chautauqua is the former puddle-jumping, propeller-plane operation from which Republic Airways Holdings evolved. The unit moved to Indianapolis in the mid-1990s.

In a conference call with analysts Thursday, Republic Airways CEO Bryan Bedford called Chautauqua a “loss maker,” and said 19 of its 73 jets were pulled from service in the first quarter.

“We decided it made more sense to park those jets rather than fly them,” Bedford said.

Some analysts on the call expressed surprise that Bedford had hope for the 50-seat aircraft segment. Rising fuel prices have made them less economical compared with larger, 70-plus-seat aircraft on which carriers can cram more paying passengers.

Airline industry analyst Michael Boyd has long warned of the unsustainable economics of 50-seat jets. He cites in part the upward spike in fuel and maintenance costs.

“It’s not a minor issue. Within the next five years, hundreds of these 37- to 50-seat airliners are going to be heading for the desert and the smelter,” the Colorado-based Boyd wrote recently of the segment.

Bedford said operating and maintenance costs “have just been running away on the small jet” portfolio. Nevertheless, Bedford said he expects to find ways to reduce costs, including working with carriers for which Chautauqua flies to find ways to reduce aircraft idle times and to generate more revenue-producing hours.

“Our challenge is to find the right price point … We still believe there’s a fundamental role for this product in the domestic marketplace,” he said.
 
Where Republic’s regional airline business is doing better is in the 70-seat and larger jets it flies under its Republic Airlines and Shuttle America operations.

Still, analysts pressed Bedford on whether regional airline competitors that have recently filed for bankruptcy reorganization, such as Pinnacle Airlines, might emerge with a cost advantage after restructuring.

Bedford said carriers such as Pinnacle may well become more competitive but through bankruptcy “breach a level of trust” with the major carriers. Post-bankruptcy, they often don’t get as many new contracts with the majors, he said.

Conversely, bankruptcies among the major airlines have hurt regionals to the extent they can use that leverage to get relief on contracts with regional carriers to fly their passengers.

Mergers have been another challenge. There’s talk that Republic customer American Airlines, which is in bankruptcy reorganization, may merge with U.S. Airways, another Republic customer.

Bedford said it was too early to speculate about how that could affect Republic’s regional segment.

Wednesday night, Republic reported first quarter profit of $10.9 million for its regional business, compared with $3.1 million in the same quarter a year earlier.

While revenue in the regional segment fell 5 percent, to $355 million, in the first quarter, Frontier's revenue rose 19 percent, to $342 million.

Frontier narrowed its loss to $21.6 million from a loss of $39 million in first quarter of 2011.

Overall, Republic beat analyst estimates with a loss for the quarter of $7.1 million, or 15 cents per share, versus a loss of $22.4 million, or 46 cents a share, in 2011.

Despite huge improvements with Frontier, “a loss is still a loss,” Bedford said.

Bedford also said Thursday that Republic has hired Barclays Capital to advise it on previously announced plans to sell Frontier or spin it off.

Republic has about 10,000 employees system-wide.

 

 


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT