Republic Airways lands $110,000 in federal penalties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Republic Airways Holdings has been assessed $110,000 in civil penalties for delays in filing financial data with the U.S. Department of Transportation.

The penalties, the second sizeable sanction against Republic proposed by regulators this year, are outlined in a consent agreement tied to “reporting delinquencies” involving subsidiaries Chautauqua Airlines, Republic Airline and Shuttle America.

The three regional airlines fly on contract for Delta Air Lines, American, Continental, US Airways and United Airlines.

In an order issued Sept. 1, the DOT said Republic “on a number of occasions” failed to file on time required financial information the agency uses to monitor such things as air carrier fitness and ownership and to analyze the effect of air transportation industry policy initiatives.

Republic, according to the order, attributed the late filings to its conversion to a new accounting software system and the integration and consolidation of multiple accounting systems.

It wasn’t clear if that is related to broader integration issues involving Frontier Airlines and Midwest Airlines, which Republic acquired last year.

Republic told regulators it has established a new, full-time position and a computerized compliance calendar to ensure reports for subsidiaries are prepared and submitted on time, among other measures.

“The Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings has carefully considered the information provided … but continues to believe that enforcement action is warranted,” the DOT said.

Republic officials declined to elaborate Friday morning.

Republic will pay the government $55,000 initially. The remaining amount can be waived, however, if the company is in compliance after one year.

The fines are financially immaterial for a company that posted more than $1.6 billion in revenue last year, but it’s the second major run-in with transportation regulators in 2010.

In April, the Federal Aviation Administration blasted the carrier for problems with the management of its maintenance program. The FAA proposed a $348,000 civil penalty against Chautauqua for allegedly operating some of its regional jets without performing inspections required under so-called FAA air worthiness directives.

Last year Chautauqua operated a Canadair regional jet for 231 flights without inspecting a section of lower wings for cracks, and flew another CRJ for 61 hours without a required inspection of electrical relays, the FAA said.

Another regional jet was flown more than 17,600 flights between 2007 and 2009 without mandatory inspections of its General Electric engines, the agency said, citing several other instances of inspection lapses.

FAA officials could not be immediately reached Friday to provide information on the outcome of the maintenance case against the company.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now