IBJNews

Republic says potential buyers have surfaced for Frontier Air

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Republic Airways Holdings Inc. has heard from potential buyers for Frontier Airlines and is close to naming an adviser on whether the unit will be sold or spun off to shareholders, CEO Bryan Bedford said.

The company will select Evercore Partners Inc., Barclays Plc or Seabury Group LLC for the advisory role, Bedford said in an interview Monday. Republic said in November that it would divest Frontier, two years after buying the Denver-based carrier out of bankruptcy.

Separating Frontier will let Republic return to its traditional role of providing regional flights for carriers such as Delta Air Lines Inc. A $120 million restructuring of Frontier that included job cuts and cost reductions has returned the unit to profit, allowing Republic to move ahead with the separation.

“We’ve had a number of calls from potential interested parties, saying ‘When you’re ready to talk we want to talk with you,’” Bedford said. “We haven’t been ready to talk yet.”

Republic shares have more than doubled since Nov. 7, the day before the Indianapolis-based company said it would separate Frontier. They fell 1.4 percent Monday to close at $6.17 each.

The probability is “fairly low” for a sale of Frontier to a competing “ultra low-cost carrier” such as Allegiant Travel Co., Spirit Airlines Inc. or JetBlue Airways Corp., the CEO said. Bedford declined to say if any of those competitors had expressed an interest in Frontier.

The company doesn’t have “a predisposition on what the right divestiture strategy is,” he said. “With the business producing profits and positive cash flow, we can be deliberate and make sure we’re getting the highest and best outcome, as opposed to feeling the need to rush into something.”

Republic is willing to be a “co-investor” in Frontier with a private equity group or to do just a partial spinoff to shareholders if needed, Bedford said.

Republic said last month that Frontier may be operating as a separate company in six to 12 months. David Siegel, a Republic director and former US Airways Group Inc. CEO, was named chief executive of Frontier last month. The carrier plans to continue paring costs, and Bedford said he couldn’t rule out additional job cuts “on the edges.” The company in November said it would trim 220 positions in Denver and Milwaukee.

Frontier will take delivery of 80 Airbus SAS neo aircraft that were ordered last year and will be delivered in 2016 through 2020, Bedford said. Republic’s separate order for 40 Bombardier Inc. CSeries aircraft remains intact, even as the airline is worried about the lack of sales for the jet, he said.

Republic is waiting to see whether the CSeries “is ultimately going to be built and delivered, which we believe it will be,” Bedford said. “What’s distressing is that it hasn’t been a particularly strong seller. We have concern about the viability of the project.”

Bombardier has 138 firm orders, 124 options, 10 purchase rights and 45 letters of intent for CSeries planes and has “seen significant progress” in development of the aircraft program, said Marc Duchesne, a spokesman for the Montreal-based company. The plane’s first flight is set for the end of this year, with initial deliveries by the end of 2013, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT