IBJNews

Republic says potential buyers have surfaced for Frontier Air

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Republic Airways Holdings Inc. has heard from potential buyers for Frontier Airlines and is close to naming an adviser on whether the unit will be sold or spun off to shareholders, CEO Bryan Bedford said.

The company will select Evercore Partners Inc., Barclays Plc or Seabury Group LLC for the advisory role, Bedford said in an interview Monday. Republic said in November that it would divest Frontier, two years after buying the Denver-based carrier out of bankruptcy.

Separating Frontier will let Republic return to its traditional role of providing regional flights for carriers such as Delta Air Lines Inc. A $120 million restructuring of Frontier that included job cuts and cost reductions has returned the unit to profit, allowing Republic to move ahead with the separation.

“We’ve had a number of calls from potential interested parties, saying ‘When you’re ready to talk we want to talk with you,’” Bedford said. “We haven’t been ready to talk yet.”

Republic shares have more than doubled since Nov. 7, the day before the Indianapolis-based company said it would separate Frontier. They fell 1.4 percent Monday to close at $6.17 each.

The probability is “fairly low” for a sale of Frontier to a competing “ultra low-cost carrier” such as Allegiant Travel Co., Spirit Airlines Inc. or JetBlue Airways Corp., the CEO said. Bedford declined to say if any of those competitors had expressed an interest in Frontier.

The company doesn’t have “a predisposition on what the right divestiture strategy is,” he said. “With the business producing profits and positive cash flow, we can be deliberate and make sure we’re getting the highest and best outcome, as opposed to feeling the need to rush into something.”

Republic is willing to be a “co-investor” in Frontier with a private equity group or to do just a partial spinoff to shareholders if needed, Bedford said.

Republic said last month that Frontier may be operating as a separate company in six to 12 months. David Siegel, a Republic director and former US Airways Group Inc. CEO, was named chief executive of Frontier last month. The carrier plans to continue paring costs, and Bedford said he couldn’t rule out additional job cuts “on the edges.” The company in November said it would trim 220 positions in Denver and Milwaukee.

Frontier will take delivery of 80 Airbus SAS neo aircraft that were ordered last year and will be delivered in 2016 through 2020, Bedford said. Republic’s separate order for 40 Bombardier Inc. CSeries aircraft remains intact, even as the airline is worried about the lack of sales for the jet, he said.

Republic is waiting to see whether the CSeries “is ultimately going to be built and delivered, which we believe it will be,” Bedford said. “What’s distressing is that it hasn’t been a particularly strong seller. We have concern about the viability of the project.”

Bombardier has 138 firm orders, 124 options, 10 purchase rights and 45 letters of intent for CSeries planes and has “seen significant progress” in development of the aircraft program, said Marc Duchesne, a spokesman for the Montreal-based company. The plane’s first flight is set for the end of this year, with initial deliveries by the end of 2013, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT