IBJNews

Republicans: Force state to live within means

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republicans hoping to win control of the narrowly divided Indiana House said Wednesday that their chief goal during the 2011 legislative session is to make the state live within its means.

For Republicans, "living within means" is usually code for passing a balanced budget with no tax increases. But with Indiana facing a deficit that could top $1 billion in the next budget year, Republicans are tweaking their proposals.

House Minority Leader Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said the state's next two-year budget doesn't have to be "honestly" balanced, meaning the state could spend more than it takes in by dipping into reserves if the economy continues to sag.

And while GOP House incumbents and candidates oppose general tax increases, they haven't ruled out a change to targeted taxes like those on cigarettes or gambling.

"These are tough times," Bosma said Wednesday during a press conference to promote the GOP agenda.

Democrats, who hold a 52-48 majority in the House, said the Republican plan left the door open for tax hikes.

"Indiana House Democrats have pledged not to raise your taxes," House Speaker Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said in a statement. "From today's events, it is clear House Republicans will be raising your taxes. We're just not sure which ones they will raise."

The GOP agenda calls for the expansion of tax credits to encourage new jobs and would allow schools to tie student performance to teacher evaluations. Bosma said Republicans would consider an immigration plan that could require people arrested to verify their immigration status before being released.

Bosma promoted the Republican plan as a specific package of pledges, compared to a Democratic plan released last week that's light on details.

"This is what we're going to do, not just what we're going to talk about," Bosma said.

All 100 seats in the Indiana House are up for election on Nov. 2.

Both parties acknowledge that passing a new budget without raising taxes would be a major challenge. State government is projected to end the current fiscal year June 30 with about $180 million in the bank. That's enough cash to run the state for about five days.

The Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute, a nonpartisan government research group, predicted last week that lawmakers and Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels could head into the next budget cycle facing a $1.3 billion deficit unless the economy drastically improves or deeper budget cuts are made.

Daniels already has cut spending by hundreds of millions of dollars, including $300 million from public schools and $150 million from higher education.

Rep. Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale, said the $1.3 billion estimate may be higher than the deficit Indiana actually faces and noted that lawmakers will get updated fiscal numbers in December before the legislative session begins in January. He said Republicans will find a way to pass a budget without using tax increases to do so.

"There are not going to be easy answers," Espich said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No GOP Solution
    The GOP has no solutions. They need to cut the staff and fluff in the Governor's and the legislature's offices, and half their pay. Actually they need to halt their pay unitl they find funds to carry on daily needs in Indiana.
  • break this
    how many administrators in your school system are making near or over $100k? how many are making more than the avg tenured teacher? how many vice principals do the schools have? how many 'deans?' public schools receive an incredible amount of money yet the results continue to lag. we need new businesses in indiana to, i dont know, employ people so they can pay taxes to support things like schools. if a business is choosing b/w indiana and another state, the state should be doing everything it can to bring that company and the jobs here. maybe you should complain about how the $ is being spent before demanding more.
  • Breaking Point
    I am a teacher and I work in an Indiana school system where we voted not to take a raise. However, I refuse to continue to vote to not take a raise when my classroom is not funded so I can do my job. My class size has grown from 24-32 students a class and it is unfortunate that I now must count on parents to give extra individual help I can no longer give EACH student. I personally spent over $500 out of pocket for supplies to make my class filled with hands on learning experiences connect to the real world. Yes I make $34k a year trying to feed a family of 4 and $500 is significant. If the state is more dedicated to tax break for business than funding the future generations as we watch other countries youth pass up ours in innovation, we can expect the USA to be a big follower and permanently lose its place as a leader.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT