IBJNews

Reservoir opponents warn of impact on rare wetland

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Opponents of a proposed reservoir along the White River are warning that the project would destroy a nature preserve's unusual wetland that's home to rare plants and animals.

Kevin Tungesvick, a local restoration ecologist, said the proposed $350 million Mounds Lake Reservoir would inundate the Mounds Fen State Nature Preserve, which features a wetland that formed following the last ice age.

Tungesvick recently told members of the Robert Cooper Audubon Society that fens are a type of wetland "so hydrologically and geologically complex" they cannot be recreated.

"Fens are not created by men; fens are created by ice ages," he said.

The Robert Cooper Audubon Society is among the environmental groups that oppose the proposed central Indiana reservoir, which would be created by damming the White River in Anderson, creating a reservoir along what's now seven miles of free-flowing river.

The Audubon Society chapter argues that the project would not only flood the nature preserve but also inundate at least one third of Mounds State Park, a park known for earthworks built more than 2,000 years ago by the Adena-Hopewell people.

The Indiana Native Plant and Wildflower Society has raised concerns about the project's impact on both the state park and miles of forested river banks where pileated woodpeckers are common.

The reservoir's proponents say the 2,100-acre lake would improve flood control, create prime real estate for waterfront housing and boost property values and economic development in the Anderson area. It would also be a future water supply for central Indiana as the population grows.

State Sen. Tim Lanane, D-Anderson, has said he's concerned about the reservoir's impact on the park and urged that discussions about the project be transparent.

According to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, the fen at the Mounds Fen State Nature Preserve was formed and is sustained by water percolating through glacial gravel deposits.

When that water reaches the surface, it is highly alkaline and creates a rare ecosystem.

The Anderson-area nature preserve was dedicated in 1980 because of its clean water and high biodiversity, The Star Press reported.

Tungesvick said that among the preserve's rare species are shining lady's-tresses — a member of the orchid family.

Ball State University biologists documented 478 plant species in the fen and concluded that its "floristic" qualities are of "paramount importance" to east-central Indiana's natural heritage.

The fen is one of only three Indiana sites for the gray petaltail dragonfly and is also home to the rare brown spiketail dragonfly, which inhabits seeps, fens and small, spring-fed streams.

A third rare species of the fen is the clamp-tipped emerald green dragonfly.

"I've had one hover in front of me in the wetland," Tungesvick said. "It's quite dramatic to see those great big green eyes staring at you."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I agree
    Get your facts. Find out how much land and where the land is that the Rickers family owns in the area. Yes I'm talking about the oil barren who owns all of those bp gas stations you see.
  • Get the facts
    There's no select few going to line their pockets. Get ALL the facts before you make up your mind. That's what the meeting are for. Ask your questions and get your answers, just quit prejudging motives and get the facts.
  • Dilemna
    Natural values versus "rising property values"? No contest. Not here.
  • Study the Facts
    Mike Smith, to line the pocket of a greedy few? LOL, it's so obvious you have not spent 1 second reading the plans of why they want to do this and how it will have a positive impact on the city and surrounding cities. Please don't come on here spewing your false and negative comments.
  • Greed over Nature
    The stated rationale to destroy an irreplaceable natural habitat is an example of the greedy few attempting to line their pockets.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT