IBJNews

Retail trade group sees modest holiday sales gain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The National Retail Federation, the nation's largest retail trade group, expects winter holiday sales to rise 2.8 percent, to $465.6 billion this year.

That would be smaller than 2010's 5.2-percent increase, but it's higher than the average increase for November and December over the past 10 years.

And it would continue a recovery begun last year after holiday sales fell the previous two years; they dropped 4.4 percent in 2008 and 0.4 percent in 2009.

NRF CEO Matthew Shay said the challenging economic climate — particularly the high unemployment rate — will weigh on the biggest shopping period of the year.

But he said stores and their shoppers are acclimating.

"While businesses remain concerned over the viability of the economic recovery, there is no doubt that the retail industry is in a better position this year to handle consumer uncertainty than it was in 2008 and 2009," Shay said in explaining Thursday's forecast.

Shay predicted a "slow and steady" holiday season.

The NRF forecast is in line with sales predictions from ShopperTrak and the International Council of Shopping Centers, which both foresee a 3-percent increase in sales for November and December. Those groups both measured a 4.1-percent increase in 2010.

Consulting firm Deloitte LLP also expects sales in the same range. It forecasts an increase of 2.5 percent to 3 percent for November through January, and it too sees a drop from a year earlier, when it measured a 5.9-percent gain.

NRF says holiday revenue grew 2.6 percent per year on average over the past decade. The NRF counts sales at discounters, department stores, grocery stores and specialty merchants. It excludes automotive dealers, gas stations and restaurants from its counts.

The industry's cautious stance heading into the holidays contrasts with stores' optimism earlier in 2011. Encouraged by strong holiday shopping in 2010, stores were starting to see a road to economic recovery. Jobs growth was gaining momentum, and consumers' confidence was climbing, though it remained anemic.

But the situation has stagnated: Job growth has sputtered, and the housing market remains weak. Gas, food and clothing cost more than a year ago. And the stock market is in turmoil over the European financial crisis and continuing uncertainty in the U.S.

The good news is that spending in mid-July through mid-September, the back-to-school period, appears to have been solid. According to MasterCard Advisors' SpendingPulse, sales of back-to-school categories like children's clothing and office supplies rose 3.2 percent for the period, the biggest increase since 2007, when they rose 2.1 percent. SpendingPulse data includes all forms of payment including cash.

Shopping in late summer is not a predictor for the holidays — because people are more focused on necessities like children's clothing and school supplies — but back-to-school trends can be a helpful gauge.

And experts say shoppers are still looking for bargains.

"The consumer needs to be lured with a deal, and that's why we are seeing more aggressive deals," said David Bassuk, managing director of retail at AlixPartners, a consultancy.

Also coming Thursday: September sales reports from selected major chain retailers, including Macy's Inc., Target Corp. and J.C. Penney Inc.

The retailers will report on a key indicator of their fiscal health: the comparison of September 2011 sales with September 2010 sales at stores open at least a year. Overall, ICSC expects the figure to rise 4 to 5 percent. It rose 4.6 percent in August.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT