IBJNews

Rock Bottom Brewery tries to hang onto downtown lease

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Landlord John Goodman wants Rock Bottom Brewery out of its West Washington Street location in downtown Indianapolis by next June.

Goodman recently rejected the restaurant's attempt to renew its lease for five more years. Rock Bottom, part of a Colorado-based chain, has occupied 14,600 square feet at 10 W. Washington St. since June 1, 1996.

The renewal notice was invalid, he said in an Oct. 8 Marion Superior Court filing, because it didn’t come from the proper entity, which is the named tenant Walnut Brewery Inc., and wasn’t delivered by the U.S. Postal Service.

“It is unusual,” said Jon Buerge, director of development and property management for Rock Bottom Restaurants Inc. in Louisville, Colo. “I think this is more he wants the space back for whatever reason.”

Buerge insists that Rock Bottom’s notice was adequate because it arrived via overnight delivery from UPS and required a signature. Similar cases in other states have been resolved in the tenant’s favor, he said. Rock Bottom filed a notice on Tuesday to have the case moved to U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana.

It’s easy to see why Rock Bottom wants to hang onto the lease. The restaurant started out paying a base rate of $16.55 per square foot, plus 4 percent of gross sales, according to the lease document that accompanied Goodman’s complaint.

Rent escalated every three or four years until it reached the current rate of $20.55 per square foot. Under the first of two five-year renewal options, Rock Bottom would pay $22.60 per square foot.

“It’s probably a little below what the market is for downtown right now,” said Steve Delaney at Sitehawk Retail Real Estate. Rents for prime locations start at $25 per square foot and go up, depending various factors, he said.

Goodman’s attorney, Gregory Zubek, said he couldn’t comment on pending litigation.

In the petition for declaratory judgment, Goodman said he needed to quickly resolve the dispute with Rock Bottom so he would have time to find a suitable tenant for the space, which is adjacent to state Health Department offices. A compatible tenant would not “leak water, grease and other fluids into the ISDH space or otherwise introduce or produce noisome odors … as has happened from time to time in the past," the filing said.

Buerge said he doesn't know of any source of tension between the restaurant and landlord. “We’ve never had any sort of bad blood with Goodman. He’s been easy enough to work with.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sounds fishy
    Sounds like he already has a new tenant lined up for the space...one that is willing to pay more for the space, but he signed RB up with a first right of refusal lease (that he is trying to get out of). Out of anyone downtown RB is constantly busy. I don't believe this leaky this or that business...
  • Pro business?
    Rock Bottom has been in that location since Circle Center was practically still a large hole in the ground. A lot of business did not survive waiting for the Mall to open. Is this how we treat a tenant that weathered the downtown resurgence from nearly the beginning?
  • Huh?
    Why would Rock Bottom's attorney want the case in federal court? Goodman's chance of winning on a bogus contractual technicality is much higher in the Southern District of Indiana than in a state court.
  • Frivolous Litigation
    So the landlord is trying to get out of the lease because the renewal was delivered by UPS instead of the Post Office. And it had the wrong entity's name on the renewal. (Very typical in the corporate world that you are owned in one name and do business in another name.) I hope that judge socks the Landlord for such a frivolous lawsuit. I know Zubek. He's a good guy. But he should be filing such a frivolous lawsuit.
  • Wouldn't want to be Mr. Zubek
    I think everyone, including Goodman's attorney, knows how this is going to unfold. Most judges would not be amused at the argument mentioned here, as it sounds like the notice was reasonably good. This might just be an attempt to renegotiate the lease terms with the tenant.
  • moron alert
    Seriously, it seems there are enough vacancies downtown that Rock Bottom can do better. What does this moron think this is Manhattan? Leave him high and dry Rock Bottom. I'll limit my future jewelry purchases to the universe of retailers that don't include this clown. Hate to end up with a cubic zirconium.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT