Rockefeller: Insurers don't spend enough on medical care

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Insurance companies including WellPoint Inc. and Aetna Inc. don’t provide consumers the benefits they paid for, which is why the industry needs close supervision, U.S. Senator Jay Rockefeller said Thursday.

Many insurers spent less revenue from premiums on medical care than is called for under the health overhaul passed last month, according to a report released by Rockefeller’s office. The legislation requires insurance companies to spend at least 85 percent of the premium revenue for large group insurance on medical care, and 80 percent of the revenue for individual and small group insurance.

While individual insurers now decide what categories to include in the ratio, the health law demands that all companies classify medical costs the same way beginning in 2011. What will be included under the ratio is being developed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, with the input of state insurance commissioners.

Only Cigna Corp. among the six largest U.S. insurers met the 80 percent threshold for the individual market in 2009, according to the report. Aetna spent 76 percent of premiums on medical care, while Humana Inc. spent 68 percent. The data in the report is from the Kansas City, Mo.-based National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which regulates insurance companies at the state level.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint “reclassified” more than half a billion dollars of administrative expenses as medical expenses when it was defining its medical-loss ratio, Rockefeller’s report said. In March, the company announced it would consider nurse call-in centers and wellness programs to be medical costs.

“Consumers can rest assured that our watchful eye will require health insurance companies to comply with the law by actually spending more money on patient care—not doing all they can to cut corners and cook the books,” Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat who is chairman of the Senate’s commerce committee, said in a statement.

WellPoint spokeswoman Kristin Binns said the company plans to expand disease-management programs, wellness initiatives and other items that are not counted as part of medical expenses by other insurers.

“We share the senator’s commitment to ensuring that the maximum resources possible are devoted to health coverage, disease management, wellness and other programs designed to improve our members’ health and medical,” Binns said in an e- mail.

Rockefeller’s report comes after America’s Health Insurance Plans, a Washington-based lobbyist for 1,300 insurers, and the Chicago-based Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, with 39 members, said they are negotiating with the state insurance commissioners group over how to define what medical costs should be included.

Insurance industry lobbyists said they were pushing for the inclusion of technology expenses, wellness programs and pay-for-performance under the threshold. Many companies now include only medical claims under the heading.

Cigna Chief Executive Officer David Cordani said in an interview that he was confident the Obama administration will allow insurers to count spending on nurses who advise customers as a medical expense. Sebelius and congressional staff indicated a willingness to do so in conversations over the past six weeks, he said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?