IBJNews

Rolls-Royce buys out control-system joint venture

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Rolls-Royce plc announced Friday that it will acquire the remaining half of Aero Engine Controls, which designs control systems for aircraft.

Aero Engine Controls is a joint venture established in 2009 by London-based Rolls-Royce and Charlotte, N.C.-based Goodrich.

Aero Engine Controls has its headquarters in the United Kingdom, but a large engineering staff works out of offices near Indianapolis International Airport. The company announced plans in January 2011 to grow its local work force to more than 200 people by 2013.

Rolls-Royce builds jet engines in Indianapolis and employs about 4,000 people locally. The joint venture, established in 2009, designs and manufactures electronic engine controllers, fuel pumps and fuel metering units for a wide range of Rolls-Royce engines and other programs.

Rolls-Royce decided to buy out its venture partner because Goodrich Corp. is being acquired by Hartford, Conn.-based United Technologies Corp.

Rolls-Royce did not disclose the purchase price but said the deal would not have a material effect on this year’s earnings.

Engine control systems play an increasingly important part in enhancing the fuel efficiency and overall performance of modern jet engines, Rolls-Royce said in a prepared statement. The acquisition will give Rolls-Royce full ownership of a critical capability that confers competitive advantage, the company said.

Aero Engine Controls employs about 1,400 people at sites in Birmingham, Derby and Belfast in the United Kingdom and Indianapolis, Rolls-Royce said.

Rolls-Royce won’t complete the transaction until United Technologies completes its acquisition of Goodrich and the deal clears anti-trust regulators.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT