IBJNews

Rolls-Royce opens plant making part for Joint Strike Fighter

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce on Friday morning unveiled a new, high-tech manufacturing site that could serve as a model for the future.

The new "focused factory" at 758 Columbia Drive in Plainfield will produce lift fans for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. The lift fan allows one version of the aircraft to make helicopter-like landings. Rolls-Royce had been developing the fan for two years and now has the production contract.  Full production will start in October, and the facility will employ 15 people at peak production in about 18 months.

"It's a high-tech facility and the only one like it in the world," said John Gallo, executive vice president of business operations. Rolls-Royce invested $6 million to outfit the space with the latest technology. One piece of equipment keeps track of tools, preventing them from becoming lost inside—and eventually damaging—the large aircraft components. The Department of Defense also spent $6 million on the build-out.

Gallo said Rolls-Royce won the lift fan contract because its latest contract with United Auto Workers Local 933 allows it to be more competitive. The focused factory will employ 12 UAW-represented workers, who are eligible for performance bonuses and trained to do multiple jobs. If necessary, Rolls can go outside the UAW for building maintenance workers.

"We're hoping through this same competitive set-up, we can win new work and new contracts going forward," Gallo said.

The Plainfield site is Rolls-Royce's 11th facility in Indiana. The British company employs 4,000 people in the state, including more than 1,700 in production in Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT