IBJNews

Rolls-Royce's profits in line with expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, the world’s second-largest aircraft-engine maker, said profit rose in line with estimates, buoyed by a backlog of orders from Boeing Co. and Airbus SAS.

Pretax profit for the full-year 2011, including matured hedging positions, increased to 1.16 billion pounds ($1.8 billion) from 955 million pounds, the London-based company said Thursday. Analysts predicted profit of 1.13 billion pounds, according to the average of 19 estimates in a Bloomberg survey. Underlying sales added 4 percent, to 11.3 billion pounds.

The company, which employs about 4,500 people in Indianapolis, doesn't break out results for U.S. operations. North America CEO James Guyette noted that in 2011 the company expanded its operations in Virginia and Indiana, following a global competition for work within the company.

Rolls-Royce decided last fall to shift production of the banded stator jet-engine component to Indianapolis in 2013. The move will result in the building of a new production line and the hiring an additional 100 people through 2017.

The company recently announced it will spend $50 million to add a second jet-engine test stand in Mississippi, and Guyette said he anticipates additional investments in 2012. “Our investments will help Rolls-Royce fulfill its $96 billion order book in four global markets—civil aerospace, defense aerospace, marine and energy,” Guyette said in a prepared statement.

Rolls-Royce’s order book swelled to a record 62.2 billion pounds as customers Airbus and Boeing benefited from airlines upgrading to more fuel-efficient models and growth in air travel in emerging markets. Profit also got a boost from a 60 million-pound payment from the United Kingdom government for the early cancellation of contracts, including one for the Rolls-Royce-powered Harrier jumpjet.

“We continue to benefit from a broad portfolio, a large and growing customer base and access to markets where demand remains strong for our products and services,” CEO John Rishton said. “For 2012 we expect good growth in both underlying revenue and underlying profit with cash flow around break-even as we continue to invest in future growth.”

Boeing started deliveries of its 787 Dreamliner model, for which GE and Rolls supply engines. Rolls-Royce also competes with a joint venture of General Electric and Pratt & Whitney to build engines for the A380, the world’s largest passenger aircraft. Rolls-Royce is the only supplier for Airbus’s upcoming A350 wide-body aircraft.

Last year, the company incurred a one-time charge to fix a fault on A380 engines following the disintegration of a Trent 900 engine on a Qantas Airways Ltd. flight.

Rolls-Royce generates the majority of sales from the civil aerospace market, with the remainder spread across its marine, defense and energy businesses.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Why then?
    If Rolls-Royce is doing so well then why do they feel the need to ask for a tax break from local(or was it state) properpty taxes. That article from a few months back indicated that they might move out of town if their exception from normal taxes request wasn't meet. Celadon trucking is/was doing the same thing while both companys claim to be doing great financially.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT