IBJNews

Salvation Army fundraising falls short; service cuts likely

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The bell ringers and their red kettles have disappeared for another year, but Salvation Army of Indiana still is nearly $500,000 short of its holiday fundraising goal—putting programs in jeopardy.

Set to end Jan. 31, the annual Tree of Lights campaign generates about a third of the revenue needed to support central Indiana programs—including drug and alcohol rehabilitation, shelters for women and children, and neighborhood community centers.

As of Jan. 4, the organization was $468,925 shy of its $2.93 million goal. And the Salvation Army doesn’t have much wiggle room.

The organization missed its revenue budget by almost $300,000 in the last fiscal year—largely because Tree of Lights missed its goal by $186,000—and used cash reserves to avoid program cuts given an increase in demand for services.

“That was our rainy-day fund, and it rained like crazy last year,” Development Director Jeff Stanger told IBJ in November. “We just don’t have that option this year.”

Officials aren’t sure yet what programs would be affected by a fundraising shortfall, and they’re still hoping to close the gap. Mail and online donations are being accepted through the end of the month.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Stop
    The Red kettles are a 6 week church fundraising campaign that the Salvation Army invented to fund the advancement and livelihood of Salvationism. They are a cult! Do the research! Their â??officersâ?? all expenses paid lifestyles, including tax grants; given to them from the SA; thus allowing them to live in multi-million dollar homes, while deceiving the public too believe they live on minimal salaries. When really the cash salaries they receive, is simply spending money. All paid for with the red kettle money.
    The Salvation Army is very top heavy! Health insurance alone probably takes up 50% of that red kettle money... look at how old most of them are. You do the math....
  • A couple of thoughts
    How about you take a look at those big salaries being paid to executives at a so-called "not for profit" enterprise? Also, I can tell you that the anti-gay position that Salvation Army takes for those seeking their services has turned many (including me) away from supporting. Open your doors, hearts and look at those salaries, rather than cut services for those in need.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT