IBJNews

Schools chief, union head recruit mentors for children

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State school superintendent Tony Bennett, a Republican, and the leader of Indiana's largest teachers union made a rare joint appearance Tuesday to promote a mentoring program, but couldn't avoid sparring when asked later about contentious education proposals expected to dominate the 2011 legislative session.

Bennett and Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, are known for their disagreements on many issues, but came together to praise the Indiana Mentoring Partnership, which has helped recruit about 800 new mentors since it was launched last year. Both said mentoring changes the lives of children and urged adults to get involved.

The program has done well, but there are still about 1,300 children on waiting lists to be paired with a mentor who will commit at least an hour a week to a child, said Bill Stanczykiewicz, president of the Indiana Youth Institute, which launched the partnership

"There's often kind of an adversarial view that maybe Tony believes this and Nate views that," Stanczykiewicz said. "They have the exact same end goal in mind, and that's the well-being and academic success of Indiana children."

After the news conference, when asked about education policy, their differing opinions became clear on collective bargaining restrictions, evaluating teachers using test scores and school choice. Those issues are part of the agenda that Bennett and Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels will push in the GOP-controlled Statehouse once the legislative session begins Wednesday.

Bennett supports a bill that would restrict collective bargaining agreements between teachers unions and school districts to cover only wage and wage-related fringe benefits. Too often, Bennett argued, contracts include details that don't contribute to student learning.

Schnellenberger pointed out that contracts are negotiated locally and that there may be reasons for specific contract details that mandate topics other than wages. He acknowledged that collective bargaining would likely be limited since Democrats, who often support the teachers union, have no control in the Indiana Statehouse this year. But he said any bills that propose eliminating those rights, which have been in place since the 1970s, should be shot down.

"I think that's a terrible mistake," he said.

Bennett said the proposal that he and his staff have been working on would limit — not eliminate — teacher bargaining. When asked if he would support such a bill if someone else proposed it, he said: "I wouldn't support anything right now that we haven't written."

Bennett and Schnellenberger also disagree about the ways teachers should be evaluated. The governor and Bennett support merit pay for teachers and want to use student academic success — measured by test scores — to help determine how a teacher is performing. Bennett wants at least half of a teacher's evaluation to be based on student performance, while Schnellenberger said that was too much.

The two leaders also clashed over school choice. Bennett and Daniels will push for vouchers that use taxpayer money to help parents pay for private-school tuition, a move that Schnellenberger said would undercut public schools and blur the line between separation of church and state.

But despite their differences, Bennett and Schnellenberger said they hope to meet several times during the legislative session and pledged to keep things civil.

"We can be gentlemen," Bennett said. "We can be respectful in our disagreement."

"There's no personal animosity between us," Schnellenberger added.

The Indiana Mentoring Partnership has a history of bringing together adversaries to support the cause. When the program was launched last year, it drew support from Purdue basketball coach Matt Painter and Indiana basketball coach Tom Crean.

The partnership works with mentoring programs across the state. Volunteers can learn more about becoming a mentor at www.abetterhour.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT