IBJNews

Sebelius asks insurers to justify rate hikes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told the nation's leading health insurers Thursday to publicly justify a spate of double-digit premium hikes that have infuriated consumers in at least a half-dozen states.

Meeting at the White House with the CEOs of Indianapolis-based WellPoint, Aetna, Cigna, UnitedHealth Group, as well as several state insurance commissioners, Sebelius asked the companies to post online their justification for proposed rate hikes primarily affecting customers who directly purchase their coverage.

"At the very least, we need some transparency," Sebelius told reporters after the meeting. "We need people to understand what's going on." The information can be difficult to obtain, since it's usually filed state-by-state.

The White House staged the event to underscore what it calls the urgent need to pass President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. Obama advisers hope that highlighting the rate hikes will put pressure not just on insurers to lower rates but also on Congress to agree on final legislation after a year-long effort.

Obama has pointed to the rate hikes as one of the main arguments for Congress to pass his plan. It would set up a new competitive marketplace for individual customers and small businesses, leading to more predictable premiums. It also would create a new consumer protection body with the power to deny unreasonable rate hikes, roll them back and obtain refunds for policy holders.

Sebelius got a polite hearing from the executives, but there was no agreement on her request for full disclosure.

"I think the response to it was constructive, but there were no commitments of any kind," said UnitedHealth CEO Stephen Hemsley.

Angela Braly, the head of WellPoint, said she wants to explore with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners better ways to tell consumers about the reasons for rate hikes. Doctors and hospitals are charging more, she explained, and "we're often in the position of being the bearer of bad news."

Noting that the companies are making healthy profits, Sebelius said she will keep pressing her request. "At least the bright spotlight may help to discourage some of these wildly exorbitant increases from occurring," she said.

Obama dropped by the meeting in the Roosevelt Room and underscored Sebelius' point that such rate hikes can't go on forever. The president has painted a bleak picture of spiraling costs and eroding coverage if lawmakers fail to pass his plan — and he's keeping the pressure on insurers as he demands a vote in Congress.

The rate increases mainly affect people buying their own coverage directly, as opposed to the majority who have employer-provided policies. Wellpoint subsidiary Anthem Blue Cross recently announced plans to boost individual insurance premiums in California by as much as 39 percent.

Since then, Sebelius said she's heard from many Americans who are worried they won't be able to afford insurance. Wellpoint has temporarily put its rate hike on hold.

Sebelius said the long-term solution is the new health insurance marketplace that Obama wants to create for individuals and small businesses. Once it goes into operation in 2014, it would foster competition and help keep rate increases in check.

Although the insurance industry opposes much of Obama's overhaul plan, the CEOs said they share the administration's concern about rising cost. It's leading their healthiest customers to drop coverage, leaving the companies with a relatively sicker pool of people.

Aetna's Ronald Williams praised the administration for bringing the group together and said: "This is what we need more of — everyone at the table collaborating."

"People are reaching the breaking point," when it comes to premiums, said Sandy Praeger, Kansas' insurance commissioner.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • NO Increase Hold Here
    I have Anthem Well Point individual insurance in Indiana and yesterday received a 25% increase in my premium startin next month. How is that a HOLD?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. $800M is a lot. There's over 800,000 people in the county/city though. I'm betting the cost of services(police, fire, roads, economic incentives to bring in new business, etc.) in Hamilton County is much more than $1000 per person. In 2012, the city of Carmel's audit report shows receipts of $268,742,988 (about 1/3 of Indianapolis's receipts) for a population of 83,573 (almost 1/10 the size of Indianapolis)...hmm, I wonder why Carmel is such a safer place to live...

  2. Would you let a mechanic diagnose your car over the internet without seeing it or taking it for a test drive? The patient needs face to face interaction with a physician to be properly diagnosed. It would seem to me that the internet diagnosis is about as silly as going to ones mirror and saying, "I wonder what I have"? And then you diagnose yourself. That's free and probably wrong too.

  3. Maybe if we treated the parents of juvie offenders who have 5 babies from 4 different daddies like stray cats and dogs who go around creating a bigger animal control problem, we wouldn't have so much of a "parenting" problem flooding both the social services and (later) correctional systems. The breakdown of morals and parental responsibilities from horndogs who can't keep it in their pants and keep their families together has caused this. If a pit bull attacks someone, it's destroyed. Everyone encourages that pets are spayed and neutered to control the pet population and prevent further issues. Maybe it's time to control the welfare population...

  4. Blocking two blocks of a street along Broadripple Ave. is not going to stop "pedestrians" from walking around. The article stated that seven people were injured as a result of a skirmish between two gun-toting "pedestrians"...not drive-bys. Most of the crimes that are committed in BR area are done by "pedestrians" that are walking in the area...not driving by. This may alleviate traffic going through the area and may steer some folks away from coming to the area because of the extra inconvenience but it will not stop a pedestrian, on foot from toting a gun while walking in that area....period.

  5. Please run for mayor Joe. We need someone to come in and clean house. They past two mayors have run administrations rampant with corruption. We need to clean house before corruption is accepted as normal like Chicago.

ADVERTISEMENT