Businessman settles with SEC in fraud case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Sheridan businessman has reached a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in a case alleging he bilked investors, engaged in illegal trading practices and misappropriated funds.

As part of the agreement, Lowell Hancher, 57, will be barred from association with any broker, dealer or investment adviser.

Earlier this year, Hancher also agreed to pay $3 million and never run a public company again but didn’t admit wrongdoing. In a court filing Wednesday, the SEC agreed to accept his offer.

The SEC accuses Hancher, as CEO of Westfield-based venture capital firm Commerce Street Venture Group Inc., of raising more than $1.8 million between 2005 and 2007 from at least 60 investors in connection with a fraudulent stock offering.

According to the recent filing, Hancher lied to investors about how their money would be invested and promised them returns of 50 percent, but he instead used the money to pay business and personal expenses.

Hancher also is accused of directing others to place 18 matched orders for more than 60,000 shares of LMWW Holdings Inc., between December 2007 and February 2008. Matching orders is an illegal practice that involves two investors buying and selling a security to each other to artificially bolster its share price.

Between September 2008 and January 2010, the SEC says Hancher convinced an Iowa-based company for which he was a director to give him and others $620,000 under the guise of taking the company private through a stock buyback. According to the SEC, he misappropriated most of the funds, created fake documents and lied to the company’s external auditor to cover up the scheme.

Hancher’s attorney, James Voyles, did not immediately return a call requesting comment.


  • Excuse me........
    Excuse me, but I think I missed seeing anything about the U S Attorney, grand jury, etc. Oh......must be a continuing story.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!