IBJNews

Seeking growth, Lilly dumps Singapore for China

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Singapore's out and China's in for Eli Lilly and Co.'s effort to grow sales internationally.

After recently deciding to close a research center in Singapore, the Indianapolis-based drugmaker has decided to open a diabetes research center in China in the second half of 2011, further ramping up its presence in what is now the world’s second-largest economy.

Lilly said last month it would close its 130-person Singapore center by year-end in order to cut costs.

But China’s growth is irresistible for Lilly—especially the growth in diabetes. The chronic disease affects roughly 90 million Chinese people—a number expected to grow rapidly as China’s population ages and becomes wealthier.

Lilly currently makes insulins and other medicines to help diabetics control their blood-sugar levels. But the basis of diabetes among Asian populations is different than among European populations, forcing Lilly to look for new therapies better suited to the Chinese.

Directing the center’s team of 100 scientists and support staff will be Bei Betty Zhang, a native of Shanghai and a graduate of the Indiana University School of Medicine, who serves as vice president of research for Lilly Research Laboratories in China.

Since the late 1990s, Lilly has invested nearly $300 million in China, including the launch of its Lilly Asian Ventures fund, which has invested $40 million into six biopharmaceutical companies in China.

Lilly also has a long-standing relationship with ShangPharma, which devotes 200 research scientists to working on Lilly projects, according to the China Bio Today website.

Lilly itself employs 2,800 people in China—more than double last year's figure.

Lilly has focused its efforts in emerging markets on six key countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Russia and Turkey. The company doesn’t disclose total sales in those markets, but it says it has doubled revenue in the past five years and expects to double it again by the end of 2014.

China represents about 40 percent of that growth potential, according to an August presentation by Jacques Tapiero, president of Lilly’s emerging-markets business unit.

“Needless to say that we must win in China,” Tapiero said. In October, Lilly officials touted their international growth, particularly in China and Japan, as a trend that will help offset looming revenue loss from its drugs losing patent protection in the United States and Europe over the next three years.

When Lilly opened its Singapore center in 2002, it was still wary of intellectual-property law in China. But in the past five years, the company has aggressively expanded in China.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • more outsourcing
    Now I know why the position I applied for at Eli Lilly was cancelled. John Lechleiter, Eli Lilly CEO, just announced on cNBC that they get to work with some of the most "talented" (read inexpensive) researchers in the world. Can't say that I blame them entirely considering the benefits of going overseas and an uncertain economic environment in the U.S.A. I'm still looking for a research position after two years of the biotech company I worked for closed.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT