Senate leader says pre-K pilot program still possible

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers could still approve a small pilot program to test state-funded pre-kindergarten, the leader of the Indiana Senate said Thursday.

The pilot program would come in addition to a comprehensive study of preschool programs that was part of the bill as it left the Senate.

“There’s an argument that we need to have something out there to see what is or isn’t working,” said Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne.

Lawmakers are trying to negotiate a compromise on a pre-kindergarten bill before the session ends March 14.

Gov. Mike Pence put state-funded pre-kindergarten for all low-income students on his agenda for the 2014 session. The House then passed a pilot program that would provide pre-K to kids in five counties who are 4 years old and have a family income less than 185 percent of the federal poverty level.

But last month the Senate stripped the pilot program out of the bill and replaced it with a study of the issue. Since then, Pence has been visiting preschool programs across the state to promote his proposal.

On Monday, he visited the Day Nursery in the Indiana Government Center North Building, where he called on lawmakers to “seize this moment in the life of our state and start the process of expanding access to quality pre-K programs.”

Pence has been meeting with House and Senate leaders to talk about kindergarten and other legislative issues about twice a week. The governor said he’s open to other preschool proposals and is flexible about the eligibility requirements.

Long said the negotiations have led to an “alternate proposal,” one that would go beyond just a study.

Still, he said he couldn’t talk about details because a deal hasn’t been finalized. He will also have to take the proposal to the Senate Republican caucus before he can sign off on an agreement with the GOP-controlled House.

Long said the proposal is still in the “formative stages.”

“There’s meaning in it,” he said. “But it can’t be too large because it would be too expensive that way – and this is not a budget year. Whatever we do has to be fiscally responsible right now.”

Legislators won’t write the next two-year budget until 2015 – and that’s looking to be more difficult than expected. State tax receipts have fallen behind projections so far this fiscal year. And the numbers for February – to be released in the coming days – are expected to be dismal.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Fort Wayne, has argued repeatedly that funding for a pre-kindergarten program should be considered in a budget year when it can be measured against other state priorities.

But Long said Thursday that a small, affordable pilot program might be a good idea – and he said students could be participating as soon as this fall.

“The keys are how are we going to pay for it and we’re working through that right now,” Long said. “We want it to be affordable and effective.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.