IBJNews

Seven years of work expected for central Indiana highway

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some who live near the heavily traveled section of U.S. Highway 31 north of Indianapolis say they're glad a long-planned reconstruction is on its way, even though planners expect it will take seven years to complete.

Work is to start next year on upgrading the highway through Carmel and Westfield to interstate standards in phases through 2017 — a key part of a $1.2 billion reconstruction project between Indianapolis and South Bend.

State highway officials presented project details in Carmel on Tuesday. Plans for the 13-mile section north from Interstate 465 include eliminating numerous traffic signals as 10 street crossings will be converted into interchanges and five crossings will be turned into overpasses or underpasses.

"I'm glad they're going to make U.S. 31 into a limited-access highway," said Ken Miles, a retired salesman from Carmel who drove on the highway when it was still a two-lane road. "Now you drive up and down 31, and you always hit the stoplights."

The highway through the northern Indianapolis suburbs carries more than 60,000 vehicles a day, according to the Indiana Department of Transportation.

Dena Jellison of Carmel called traffic on the highway a "madhouse."

"You cannot get in and out anywhere, because the traffic volume is so high," she said.

Construction is under way on two other projects aimed at streamlining the drive along the 120-mile route between South Bend and Indianapolis.

A new roadway is being built between South Bend and Plymouth and a new bypass around Kokomo, one of the most congested parts of the highway, is expected to be completed by the end of 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 31
    sho me the money,

    For goodness sakes, you dufus, do you just practice Patrick Bauer speak in the mirror? The toll road wasn't sold; it was leased? Do you even know the difference?

    Wowsers......
  • Figures don't add up
    Take this project at 1.2B add in the I-69 extension at 3.2B and the sum is greater than the money we received for selling the toll road.

    Yet we cut education, cut state police, cut state workers,etc., but we waste all this money on roads. Where is the funding for Mass Transit? Are we forever stuck in the 50's?
  • pretty expensive
    $1.2 billion...not bad...it's amazing how fast people start criticizing public transportation $3 mil deficit or cost of building high-speed rail, etc...but we spend billions on roads. Let's be honest about the true cost of living in suburbs and driving a car...that's the largest government hand-out in this country. And then we go complaining about library cost...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT