IBJNews

Shareholder group wants WellPoint to become not-for-profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Saying WellPoint Inc. has failed to live up to its commitment to provide “the best healthcare value” for customers, three shareholders of the Indianapolis-based health insurance giant want it to convert to a not-for-profit organization.

They have proposed that the company study the feasibility of such a conversion. The proposal will be voted on at WellPoint’s annual meeting of shareholders in Indianapolis on May 18.

The proposal was disclosed Friday in WellPoint’s proxy statement. The three shareholders—Rob and Karen Stone of Bloomington and Julia Vaughn of Indianapolis—will stage a press conference about the proposal Wednesday morning in front of WellPoint’s Monument Circle headquarters.

“WellPoint has had a heap of (well-deserved) bad publicity lately about their corporate culture of greed,” Rob Stone, an emergency physician at Bloomington Hospital, wrote in an e-mail. He referred to recent controversy over WellPoint's premium hikes in California, Indiana and other states, and to Friday’s report that its executives enjoyed boosts in compensation last year ranging from 50 percent to 75 percent.

WellPoint's board of directors urged shareholders to vote the proposal down.

“The proponent of this proposal has not presented any factual information to support the view that converting to nonprofit status would benefit us or our shareholders, employees, customers and members,” the board members wrote in a statement in WellPoint’s proxy filing. They said a feasibility study of the issue “would be costly and would distract management and the Board from overseeing our operations.”

Board members added that as a not-for-profit organization, the company would have poorer access to capital and, by not being able to pay executives with stock, would have a harder time attracting top-level managers.

WellPoint’s predecessor company, Anthem Inc., was a mutual insurance company until its initial public offering in 2001. It was, however, always a for-profit entity. Many of the companies acquired by Anthem or other WellPoint predecessors did convert from not-for-profit to for-profit status before being acquired.

The Stones and Vaughn would like to see the United States adopt a single-payer health insurance system, where the U.S. government would act as insurer for all Americans. Their proposal claims that WellPoint spends as much as 19 percent of its premium dollars on administration and profit, compared with about 3 percent spent on overhead by the federal Medicare insurance program for seniors.

“Although this is good for WellPoint’s profitability and share price, it supports the argument that for-profit health insurance is a major reason for the discrepancy in overhead expenses between the U.S. and other countries,” the shareholder proposal reads. “Nations with universal systems spend about half what we spend on a per-capita basis and have better health outcomes.”

During last year's annual shareholder meeting, Rob Stone called informally for WellPoint's board to re-mutualize the company.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Health Insurance Giants
    Health insurace companies add no value to health care. A third of your premium dollars goes to corporate profits, executive salaries, and a bureaucracy that exists to keep you from getting the health care you need. Wouldn't it be better to spend that on actual care and research? Just think about it.
  • well said...
    Hattie and Dr. Stack...took the words right out of my mouth!
  • socialism? or Common Sense?
    Every other modern democracy in the industrialized world covers its people with some version of a single payer, nonprofit health care system. They know how to provide quality care while controlling costs, yet they spend half what we do. The insurance industry middlemen are indeed "parasitic, leeches" siphoning off 20-30 cents of every US health care dollar. That money is needed for care! Save lives, save family budgets, save our economy. Support single payer. Bravo to Dr. Stone and Hoosiers for a Common Sense Health Plan.
    • obsolete industry
      bravo to dr. stone and julia vaughn and colleagues for their efforts to point out the destructive nature of wellpoint and its underlying industry.
    • Dump the Shares
      Why are they shareholders? They have been making money since they purchased stock so if they don't like making money then sell their shares.
    • Shareholder Group???
      The three person group gets separate article in IBJ, things must really be slow in Indy.
    • Wellpoint
      My opinion is that this country was founded on being able to make a profit. The USA is a democratic society, not socialistic like other countries in Europe. I believe we to watch what the government does with private business. If you want socialism then move to Russia or another socialistic type of government. Yes big brother will always be watching, but we need smaller government not, the governments hand into everything. Just because we live in the USA doesn't entitle us to all things. Yes I believe everyone should have health care, but I dont believe the government needs to provide it.
      We still have people immigrating to the USA because they feel that is the greatest country on earth. They have an opportunity to make themselves and their families a living. They come here because they feel they can better themselves here. What happened to making a living for your family, not demanding to make a living. Just because you live in the USA doesnt mean you deserve to make money by living off the government.
      • Interesting
        I think this concept should at leased be looked at by the Board. That's all these individuals are asking is to look into it more deeply. They have some valid reasoning for doing so. However, if it were to be a true Non-Profit - this would wreck havoc on Marion County and some of the outlying communities that Anthem/WellPoint has offices in as a NFP status would mean no more Property Taxes as well. A HUGE blow to Marion County Taxpayers, the tax base, and other additional taxes collected.

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

        2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

        3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

        4. Send them back NOW.

        5. deport now

        ADVERTISEMENT