IBJNews

Shelbyville manufacturer takes on big name in tumblers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Shelbyville manufacturer is seeking to cancel a trademark held by Tervis Tumbler Co., which built a $75 million business around making double-walled plastic cups.

Williams Industries Inc. of Shelbyville makes a similar product, but the business line is in danger of drying up since Tervis sent a cease-and-desist letter to a key Williams customer, Hit Promotional Products Inc. of Largo, Fla.

Williams responded with a federal lawsuit that claims Tervis had no right to trademark the horizontal lines that are featured on both companies’ transparent tumblers.

“Regardless of who thought of it first, it’s just a design that’s out there,” said Dwight Lueck, Williams’ attorney at Barnes and Thornburg in Indianapolis. “When people see those lines, they don’t think of Tervis.”

Williams makes a variety of plastic products, but the one at issue is called the Titan tumbler, which it makes for Hit. Hit suspended orders after it received a letter last month from an attorney for Tervis, based in North Venice, Fla. Tervis demanded that Hit stop selling the Titan tumblers by July 1.

The halt in business could do “substantial harm” to Williams, according to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court of southern Indiana.

Lueck said he could not disclose details about Williams’ sales and how they'll be affected if it loses Hit's business. Luke Williams, president of the family-owned business, could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

Doug Cherry, an attorney in Sarasota, Fla., who represents Tervis on intellectual property matters, said the company would not comment on litigation. Tervis hasn't yet replied to the Williams suit, filed June 27.

Tervis sells its tumblers through company stores in major tourist destinations and retailers including Bed Bath & Beyond. The tumblers usually feature team logos or other designs floating between the plastic walls.

Tervis applied in 2003 for registration of the horizontal lines as a trademark and received it in 2006. The trademark was the basis of the cease-and-desist letter that Cherry sent to Hit on June 21.

But Williams’ lawsuit alleges Tervis didn’t have a right to that trademark in the first place. The company noted that a number of companies make insulated plastic tumblers with horizontal lines. Among them is Signature USA, a Minnesota drinkware maker that’s been in business for 25 years.

Williams’ attorneys believe they can show that Signature was making its tumbler with horizontal lines in 2003, when Tervis claimed it was the exclusive user of that design.

Tervis said in a December press release that its sales have grown five-fold since 2000 and were expected to top $75 million last year. The family-owned company has expanded a Florida manufacturing plant that opened in 2005 and employs about 400 people.

Tervis, which has been in business since 1967, said in its press release that license agreements with professional and college sports teams were a factor in its growth.

Williams Industries has been in business since 1944 and manufactures a number of products, including drinkware, mouse pads, counter and floor displays, wipe-off boards, keychains, signs and decals. It specializes in molding and printing work. The company has about 160 employees, according to public documents.

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.

ADVERTISEMENT