IBJOpinion

SHEPARD: Conrad's intensity still felt downtown

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Randall ShepardSurely Larry Conrad is smiling over the recent report about the phenomenal strength of the housing market in downtown Indianapolis.

Conrad was a force of nature who served multiple terms as Indiana secretary of state, ran for governor in 1976, and later became part of Simon Property Group Inc. He died much too young during emergency heart surgery, while attending a meeting in France about building more livable cities.

The new report about downtown housing, prepared for Indianapolis Downtown Inc. by Indiana University’s Public Policy Institute, brought to mind one of Conrad’s smoothest maneuvers.

The year must have been about 1987. The Colts had managed to muscle their way into a coveted slot on “Monday Night Football” for the very first time. This was a big deal—three hours of live television, the Goodyear blimp and all the rest. How could we maximize the moment?

Conrad’s idea was that Indy needed to look like a winner. He persuaded the owners and managers of downtown buildings (especially the tallest ones) to keep their lights on that particular Monday night. As the blimp sent images around the nation during the game, Indianapolis looked like the genuine big-time operation it was on the way to becoming.

Fast-forwarding some 25 years, the new report for IDI has revealed something powerful about the present and future of the city. Put in stark economic terms, downtown housing has become a product so much in demand that the price keeps rising modestly even as the supply expands dramatically.

This explosion in supply is hard to miss. Projects in every quadrant spring up as new construction or rehabilitation or both. John Watson had barely finished his rehab of Stadium Lofts, and filled it, when his crews started on new buildings next door. Altogether: 2,000 new downtown units in the last decade, with 3,500 more under construction or in the pipeline for the next three years.

The powerful demand that makes all this possible arises from two factors, according to the new report.

First, downtown Indianapolis has become a growing magnet offering new jobs all along the salary scale. As Drew Klacik of PPI points out, the 2.6 square miles inside the downtown interstates contain 4 percent of Indiana’s total employment (think life sciences, education, finance).

Second, both millennials and baby boomers are more often gravitating toward downtown living.

Do people living elsewhere in Marion County and the metropolitan area have a stake in the success of downtown? The question nearly answers itself. Most downtown jobs are held by people who commute five or 25 miles. And the sporting and cultural attractions enhance life in the suburbs even for people who do not commute.

The initiatives that created our present success were hardly accidental. Prolonged investment by public and private and charitable institutions, plus good civic leadership, made it happen.

When new potential projects present themselves, we’ll be better off if we view the whole range of people who stand to benefit. As the City-County Council makes thoughtful progress on a panhandling ordinance, for example, it would be good to keep in mind that the largest number of people who stand to gain are the thousands of low-wage workers in the tourism and convention business.

The competition to build great cities will be won by commitment to careful research by organizations like IDI and PPI, and through the inventiveness of people who dream up new ideas as successors to Larry Conrad.•

__________

Shepard, Indiana chief justice from 1987 to 2012, is executive in residence at Indiana University’s Public Policy Institute, a research arm within IU’s School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT