IBJNews

Should the mayor have control of Indianapolis' public schools?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A group of local power brokers is quietly assembling a plan that would transfer control of Indianapolis Public Schools to the Indianapolis mayor.

Organizers of the effort, which has been in the works for months, favor replacing elected IPS board members with mostly mayoral appointees, who would select the district’s superintendent. That would give the mayor a direct say in school-related decisions.

Harris-David-mug Harris

Voters in the IPS district would have to pass a referendum to move the plan forward.

Its chief backers are The Mind Trust, a local education-reform group led by former Mayor Bart Peterson’s charter schools director, David Harris, and board members Peterson and Mark Miles. Miles is CEO of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership and Peterson now is an Eli Lilly and Co. senior vice president.

Eugene White White

Other community leaders, including Ice Miller partner Lacy Johnson and Indiana University Health Chief Operating Officer Sam Odle, also helped shape the plan and support it, according to people familiar with the discussions.

Those involved in the talks said they were not ready to discuss the plan publicly, in part because they haven’t worked out their strategy for building community support.

Supporters had intended to take the proposal before the Legislature this year to allow for a fall referendum, but factors such as the Democrats’ five-week absence from the Statehouse hindered their momentum.

Now, they aim to pass Legislation next year, with hopes of holding a referendum in the fall 2012 general election.

Efforts to shift control of IPS—the state’s largest district with about 32,000 students and among its lowest-performing—to the Mayor’s Office have surfaced several times in recent decades. Cities such as New York and Chicago have given control to the mayor, some with notable success.

Locally, the issue has gained more traction lately.

“Whatever we’ve tried doesn’t seem to have done what the city would want IPS to do,” said Indianapolis Urban League President Joe Slash, a former deputy mayor and education advocate who hasn’t been directly involved with the plan.

IPS factbox 2Others say the time has never been riper.

The state rolled out a plan this session detailing how the Indiana State Board of Education would intervene to improve performance at schools eligible for state takeover—defined as those that remain in the lowest performance category for the sixth consecutive year.

Seven of the 21 Indiana schools that could be eligible for such intervention at the start of the next academic year are within IPS.

Pushing mayoral control, some advocates say, could provide a local alternative to state takeover, or an answer to who controls the schools after the state overhauls them.

Meanwhile, the Legislature this session has passed a slew of education-reform bills that would give a mayor in charge of the district broad authority to institute performance-based pay and rein in collective bargaining.

Other urban districts under mayoral control have rolled out similar changes—initiatives that reform advocates strongly believe would boost achievement in IPS.

But the idea already faces opposition from some powerful civic leaders, including Mayor Greg Ballard and IPS Superintendent Eugene White.

Among their chief concerns is the fairness of singling out one of 11 school districts in the county for mayoral takeover.

White said the move is premature and doesn’t take into account the mixed results of mayoral control in other cities.

“People are so desperate for a solution, they’re reaching out for anything,” White said. “The evidence is not there that it works.”

Inconclusive evidence

That depends on which evidence you examine.

ballard-greg-mug Ballard

A study by Kenneth Wong, chairman of the education department at Brown University, found that schools in districts under mayoral control posted higher test scores in reading and mathematics at the elementary and secondary levels. He looked at scores in about 100 urban districts from 1999 to 2003.

Wong, who has studied mayoral control in cities across the United States, said the system improves accountability by moving it from several elected officials to one.

“Education is very much a part of the quality of life—it’s an important neighborhood revitalization strategy,” Wong said. “The mayor could really put education in the center of the citywide agenda.”

That’s what happened in Chicago. After taking over Chicago Public Schools in 1995, Mayor Richard Daley issued an executive order to ensure other city departments paid attention to schools’ needs.

That led the parks agency to provide more after-school and summer programs, and the sanitation department to ensure school buses could be mobile after heavy snow.

Those kinds of efforts, coupled with more rigorous student standards, produced results in Chicago. In the last decade, the district, once considered among the nation’s worst, roughly doubled the number of students who met state standards on achievement tests.

“There are many examples where it has proven to be a very valuable tool for improving the quality of education,” Peterson said. “I think you’d see the ability to bring more of a clear focus on what it takes to improve educational outcomes for underserved kids.”

But other studies show less rosy results.

melina kennedy Kennedy

An analysis released last year by Rutgers University determined evidence didn’t show a causal relationship between mayoral control and schools’ improvement.

A 2009 report by Milwaukee-based Public Policy Forum determined mayoral control could improve a district’s fiscal condition but not necessarily the achievement of students.

And mayors that have authority over schools often find it’s a mixed blessing—giving them more clout to make a difference but also entangling them in controversy.

During Michelle Rhee’s 2007-2010 tenure as the schools chief in Washington, D.C., the graduation rate rose and enrollment increased for the first time in 40 years.

But steps Rhee took to bring about those changes—including firing more than 200 underperforming instructors and implementing merit pay—created such an uproar that the mayor who appointed her lost a primary race, derailing his re-election plans.

Local challenges

Indianapolis’ governance structure could make mayoral control even more difficult here, some say.

Because the mayor represents the entire county, which includes eight township school districts, two excluded-city school districts and IPS, overseeing just one district raises questions about representation.

IPS factbox 1And while IPS has struggled with poor performance, the township schools also have room for improvement, some observers say. That’s why some argue the discussion should include an examination of the governance structure of all districts, not just one.

“There are too many failures in all of those districts,” said Derek Redelman, vice president of education and work-force development for the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, which has pushed for education reform. “We really ought to be looking at the education system in Marion County as a whole.”

The Mayor’s Office, Redelman added, should lead that kind of conversation.

It’s unclear whether Ballard plans to do that. But he is unconvinced mayoral control of IPS is the answer.

“I don’t think people have an appetite for that,” Ballard said.

Melina Kennedy, his likely Democratic challenger in the November election, said she recognizes there’s no silver bullet to improving IPS. But mayoral control should be considered among other solutions, she said, as long as it includes community input and a referendum.

“Acknowledging the challenges our schools have had,” Kennedy said, “it’s appropriate for that to be on the table as an option.”

If such a plan were to pass, it’s unclear whether the new board would choose to keep White as superintendent.

White argues the district needs more time for initiatives he has launched since assuming the job in 2005 to pay off. Those include expanding full-day kindergarten, adding magnet programs and, most recently, altering the academic calendar

Last year, the district’s graduation rate showed a double-digit increase to 58 percent, though it remains below the statewide average of 84 percent. ISTEP scores also increased at all grade levels, with 42 percent of students passing both English and math portions of the test.

White, who has long complained that collective bargaining agreements inhibit his ability to retain some of the best teachers, said new state legislation also will make it easier for the district to raise the level of teacher quality.

“We intend to turn that around,” White said. “We don’t need mayoral control to make that happen.”

But many who support at least exploring the concept of mayoral control have grown weary of waiting for change.

“I think there are a lot of what-ifs right now,” Slash said of the prospects for local reform. “But a lot of frustrated people want to see IPS improve.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Unigov
    Because of UniGov - certain aspects are governed county wide - others are not
  • military does it
    Have you ever wondered why the forefathers put a civilian in charge of the military? It's because they knew that the ranking officers would be too worried about keeping their job to do their job and would be more interested in power grabbing than focusing on the mission at hand. This seems to be a striking parallel. Perhaps a civilian (the mayor) needs to be at the top and let the generals (superintendant and admin) focus on achieving the objective. Just a thought.
  • Both sides
    At the recent "Five Mayors" event, this policy was discussed. The idea behind giving the Mayor control is accountability. Nobody can name their school board members. Few people vote for their school board members. By giving control to the Mayor, we have one person who we can hold accountable for the successes and failures of the schools. Think education is horrible in Indy? Then just vote out the mayor! It should also be noted that all five of the "Five Mayors" supported this plan, including men from both parties. This isn't a "give-Ballard-more-power" plan. This is a "Give-the-people-a-choice" plan.
  • Speedway/Beech Grove
    Then why do the residents of Speedway and Beech Grove get to vote in Indianapolis mayoral races?
    • Racist? Really?
      Ann - How you get racism oout of this I'll never know. Although, stupid me... as we've seen in recent years, one can get racism out of a cracker jack box. How sick of the repubs can you really be? It's only recently that they've had any power in Indy at all. And your dem friends are such upstanding representatives of our community. Oh wait, I think recently they spent more time in Illionois that Indiana... but you keep displaying your ignorance. Pretty soon our public schools will be worse than Misissippi's. (Let me guess... that was racist, too). Grow up, grow a spine, and grow a brain!
    • Waitaminit!
      One, the Mayor does NOT have any governance in either Speedway or Beech Grove, so there's one flaw.
      Two, you have to start somewhere. IPS is the poorest-performing system in the county, if not the state. Logical target.

      I'd say go for it!
      • Conflict of Interest
        Should the person running IPS, also be allowed to authorize charter schools in the same district? This seems like a conflict of interest.
      • Not just IPS
        There is no way the mayor should only get control of IPS. If the mayor's office takes control of the schools, it should be all the school for which he governs, i.e. all the townships/Speedway/Beech Grove. Why would they get to vote to elect the mayor but not have to deal with the consequences of the school related decisions he/she makes.
      • Absolutely NOT
        Transferring power from a knowledgable school board with superintendent to the mayor's office will not solve the problem of a failing system. Eroding the tax base through vouchers is part of the problem now. If Wishard was a failing hospital system, would we transfer its functions to the mayor's office to be run by novices? Then why would we do the same for an educational system?
      • Not A Racist Move
        Ann, please think before you start writing because you show your ignorance. It is not the Republicans overreaching. Most of the people on that list are influential Democrats in the Indianapolis area.
      • for it
        If it means we can get rid of Eugene White I'm for it!!!
      • sounds obvious
        moving the district under the umbrella of the mayor sounds like a no brainer to me. Go for it!
      • Make up your mind
        Hey Cunningham, which is it? Do you want government out of education (privatization) or do you want to keep government involved in education (funding, regulation, oversight) If you support tax-funded schools, then there has to be government regulation and oversight, right? Do you think the current IPS schoolboard is making good decisions on behalf of the district and the city? If not, what would you change so that the people running Indianapolis Public Schools are actually representatives of the Indianapolis public?
      • no to mayors control
        there is no room in education for the government, but something needs to be done about our childrens future. Closing the schools is not the solution.
        • School
          No that should be left to the educators not polititions
        • Why don't they break up IPS
          I believe they should break-up IPS into smaller districts. I think that would make the schools easier to manage with better use of the taxpayers money and would bring about competition. Just a thought to consider.
        • It seems to me
          I am 100% for the recent education reform measures, school choice, charter schools, vouchers, etc. But I don't like the idea of a takeover run by the mayor's appointees. Not only is it undemocratic, but it seems redundant, since families increasingly have alternatives to IPS.
        • Maybe not racism
          But certainly a pure example of the Republican love for dictatorial control of all things.

          I wonder what they find so distasteful about elected boards? Could it be that those boards represent the will of the people more than the will of the wealthy?
        • "RACIST"
          Anytime something is said or done about someone of "color", Its racist. How about showing a little concern for the good of "all"school age kids. I think anything would be an improvment.
        • I don't know
          There are an awful lot of racial minorities and democrats on the list of supporters.
        • Racist Move
          I am so sick of these Republicans over reaching. Looks like a racist move to me.
          And what does this guy know about education?

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
           
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

          2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

          3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

          4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

          5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

          ADVERTISEMENT