Shrunken Lauth emerges from reorganization

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lauth Investment Properties, which holds the remains of the real estate empire of Lauth Group, announced its emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization Friday, with about $25 million and a portfolio of properties valued at $35 million.

The announcement ends a two-year court battle that left the once-mighty Indianapolis-based company a tiny—but still living—player in the world of real estate development.

When it filed for bankruptcy protection in May 2009, Lauth declared $759 million in total assets and $635 million in liabilities. The company, which once employed 450, now has 27 employees.

Lauth is still developing or managing 23 properties, as well as nine land parcels, according to documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Indianapolis.

The amount of its indebtedness means the company has no enterprise value, according to an analysis included in bankruptcy documents.

The bankruptcy reorganization plan estimates that Lauth will pay 75 percent to 100 percent of the $18.6 million it owes Milwaukee-based M&I Bank. M&I will also receive land from Lauth as collateral.

Otherwise, Lauth set aside $21,000 to pay off any unsecured claims, meaning unsecured creditors will receive almost nothing. The company’s equity ownership structure from before its bankruptcy remains intact.

Bob Lauth, who remains CEO of Lauth Investment Properties, said in a statement: “The process we just completed was one we never planned for or expected. Nonetheless, we successfully worked through the myriad details that LIP’s complex structure required. We are glad to have it behind us.”

Indeed, Lauth’s bankruptcy reorganization was dominated by a bitter battle with lender Inland American Real Estate Trust Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank. Inland objected to a 2007 restructuring under which Lauth’s executives transferred their personal liability on loans to a separate entity, thereby shielding themselves. Inland had loaned Lauth $228 million that year.

But, with the help of a mediator, Lauth reached a settlement with Inland, in which the lender received $1 million and Lauth’s equity stake in six properties, including its former headquarters along the northern rim of Interstate 465.

Separately, Wells Fargo Bank accused Bob Lauth and his top brass of transferring assets to their wives just before defaulting on loans. Wells Fargo’s claims are pending in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis.

Meanwhile, Bankruptcy Judge Basil H. Lorch III issued an injunction against any pending or further litigation against Lauth related to its bankruptcy.

Before the 2008 real estate and financial crisis, Lauth had about 60 properties in its development portfolio and was ranked the 13th largest developer in the United States.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.