SIDDIQUI: Conflict, ideology devalue education

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SiddiquiRecent ISTEP test scores seem to indicate a correlation between academic success and economic prosperity. These test results show that school districts in affluent neighborhoods have better scores than schools in poorer neighborhoods.

Regardless of whether one agrees with the ISTEP tests as a measure of academic success, we should all be concerned with this disparity. A student’s test scores should not depend upon economic circumstances regardless of the weight we give to those scores.

If we look beyond local political allegiances, we will find models that can be adapted to meet our needs as Hoosiers.

During an interfaith trip to Kenya, I saw firsthand how alleviating hunger can dramatically improve attendance, academic success and the drive to achieve.

During this trip to witness the impact of philanthropic contributions of Indianapolis congregations to alleviate hunger for orphans and vulnerable children in Kenya, I met a principal who has turned her school around. Her schoolchildren receive some of the highest test scores in that region despite extreme poverty.

This school was turned around by an amazing educator who asked the most troubled children in her school why they wouldn’t study and created problems instead. Their answer: They were hungry.

She was determined to solve the poverty and hunger issues to resolve the academic issues. By empowering her students to grow food, start micro businesses and engage with their school beyond classroom learning, she has established a model for poverty-based school programs the world over.

The Harlem Children Zone (HCZ) is another good example of how a comprehensive approach toward poverty can influence academic success. HCZ has a block-by-block approach to tackling poverty. It includes a baby college for children ages 0-3, all-day kindergarten, extended-day charter schools, health clinics and community centers, youth violence prevention efforts, social services, and college retention programs.

The ideas exist across the world. Many of these programs also exist in Indianapolis.

What we seem to lack is a coordinating body that can marshal all these resources to help save children one block at a time. This coordinating body should help education funders, policymakers and activists come together and focus on our children’s education.

The coordinating body should focus funding and initiatives to help improve schools one block at a time. This incremental approach will help uplift our communities and assist in economic development sustainably.

Initiatives like these should include important partners like Indianapolis Public Schools and charter schools alike. Institutions like IUPUI, University of Indianapolis, and Butler, Marion and Martin universities should be included as key players. These institutions have the history and resources to further such work.

IUPUI in particular has centered its work in the urban core of Indianapolis and is driven by its mission of being an exemplary urban university. Its programs like education, social work, public affairs, philanthropy, public health, law and education provide it a comprehensive scope to lead the fight against poverty to achieve stronger educational achievement. IUPUI and Indianapolis would be well-served to anchor such an initiative.

Unfortunately, disunity among education advocates devalues our educational initiatives.

People on all sides of the education debate have a choice between pursuing a purist, fragmented approach or putting aside their differences and finding unifying principles that can lead to a comprehensive approach to achievement.•


Siddiqui is an attorney, doctoral student at Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University, and publisher of Siddiqui Public Affairs Review. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.