IBJNews

Simon bids $4.6B for U.K.'s Capital Shopping

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. mall owner, made an offer for Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc that values the U.K. company at 2.9 billion pounds ($4.6 billion).

Simon would pay 425 pence a share in cash for London-based Capital Shopping, the U.K.’s biggest retail landlord, according to a Wednesday statement. That’s 26 percent more than Capital Shopping’s closing share price on Nov. 24, the day before Simon’s interest was disclosed. Capital Shopping has so far refused to cooperate with Simon.

Capital Shopping owns four of the U.K.’s 10 biggest malls, including the Manchester Arndale. Simon said its bid is conditional on Capital Shopping not completing the acquisition of Trafford Centre. The British company agreed last month to pay 1.6 billion pounds in shares and assumed debt for the Manchester mall in what would be the U.K.’s biggest property transaction.

“This is still a ‘phony war’ and inadequate,” Mike Prew, a London-based analyst at Nomura International, said in a note to investors. “It is not a knockout blow.”

Simon’s proposed offer is 13 percent higher than Capital Shopping’s net asset value of 377 pence a share as of Nov. 1. Land Securities Group Plc, the U.K.’s largest real estate investment trust, closed Wednesday at 9.4 percent below its net asset value as of Sept. 30 and British Land Co., the second- largest REIT was 2.6 percent lower.

Capital Shopping gained as much as 3.9 percent to 411.9 pence in London trading. The shares were priced at 406.9 pence at 10:23 a.m., bringing this year’s gain to 2.3 percent. Simon owns 5.1 percent of the stock, it said on Dec 8.

Capital Shopping disclosed Simon’s interest last month while announcing the agreement to buy the Trafford Centre from closely held Peel Group. To help with financing, Capital Shopping raised 221.2 million pounds from selling the equivalent of 9.9 percent of its outstanding equity to investors. The deal would give Peel as much as 25 percent of Capital Shopping. Shareholders are scheduled to vote on the proposal on Dec. 20.

In the same statement, Capital Shopping said it rejected Simon’s request to delay the purchase and share sale to give the U.S. landlord time to prepare an offer. Capital Shopping refused last week to provide Simon with information it said it needed to evaluate a possible takeover bid.

“Our proposed offer is highly favorable and attractive to CSC shareholders,” Simon said. “We are enthusiastic about this opportunity and committed to dedicating substantial time and financial resources with a view to concluding a transaction as soon as possible.”

Simon cut its European holdings this year with the sale of its interest in a joint venture that owned seven shopping centers in France and Poland. It recorded a gain on the sale of $281 million, according to a regulatory filing.

Simon gets 3.5 percent of its net operating income from international operations, according to a third-quarter supplemental report. The company also owns outlet shopping centers in Japan, Mexico and South Korea.

Earlier this year, Simon bid unsuccessfully for U.S. rival General Growth Properties Inc., which emerged on Nov. 9 from the largest-ever U.S. real estate bankruptcy.

Simon’s announcement Wednesday doesn’t constitute a firm offer for Capital Shopping and there can be no certainty that any bid will ultimately be made, the company said. Any offer is also conditional on due diligence and Simon arranging debt finance.

Simon appointed Citigroup Inc., Lazard Ltd. and Evercore Partners Inc. as financial advisers and Freshfields and Wachtell Lipton as its legal advisers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT