IBJNews

Simon may drop interest in Capital Shopping Centres

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. will end its interest in buying Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc if the U.K. company doesn’t provide information necessary to evaluate a bid. Capital Shopping fell as much as 4.7 percent in London trading.

“By declining to provide us with the requested limited due diligence information, you have constrained the exploration of an opportunity to benefit your shareholders,” Simon said in a letter to Capital Shopping included in a statement Wednesday.

Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, said last month it was considering an unspecified cash bid worth more than Capital Shopping’s net assets. Capital Shopping rejected a request from Simon to delay selling shares and buying the Trafford Centre mall in northwest England, a move that would have given the U.S. company more time to prepare an offer.

“I think it’s a done deal,” Graham Jones, an analyst at Arbuthnot Securities Ltd., said today by telephone. “Capital Shopping will press ahead and Simon will disappear off the share register.” Jones doesn’t have a rating on the stock.

Capital Shopping shares had the biggest decline in two weeks. They were down 15.6 pence, or 3.8 percent, at 392.4 pence at 9.59 a.m., reducing the company’s market value to 2.7 billion pounds ($4.2 billion).

Michael Sandler, a spokesman for Capital Shopping, declined to comment. In a Nov. 24 statement, the company announced a plan to buy the Trafford Centre from closely held Peel Group for 1.6 billion pounds in stock and assumed debt. The total purchase price would be the highest ever paid for a British mall.

“If the proposed Trafford Centre acquisition is approved, we would need to consider liquidating our position in CSC,” Simon said in its letter. The company has a 5.1 percent stake in London-based Capital Shopping, Britain’s biggest mall owner.

Simon said the U.K. company is “substantially overpaying” for the mall in a transaction that would give Peel a stake of as much as 25 percent in Capital Shopping. Investors are scheduled to vote on whether to approve the transaction on Dec. 20.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT