IBJNews

Slower sales curb results at Adesa parent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Slower auto sales caused KAR Auction Services Inc. to fall short of Wall Street’s third-quarter expectations, the Carmel-based company announced Thursday morning.

The company also lowered its profit forecast for the year.

KAR, which operates Adesa auto auction facilities, had net income of $32.2 million in the three months ended Sept. 30, a 26-percent increase from the same quarter a year earlier.

But, after accounting adjustments, the company suffered a 16-percent decline in its adjusted earnings, from $38.6 million in the third quarter last year to $32.4 million this year.

On a per-share basis, KAR’s adjusted profit slid from 28 cents in the third quarter a year ago to 23 cents this year. Wall Street analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected KAR to earn 28 cents per share.

The big culprit was auto auction sales, which fell nearly 10 percent, to $241.3 million. KAR’s overall revenue, which also includes results of its auto salvage and dealer financing operations, totaled $447 million, up slightly from a year earlier.

Analysts were expecting revenue of nearly $455 million, according to Thomson Reuters.

KAR dropped its full-year profit forecast, excluding accounting items, to $1.18 to $1.20 per share. In August, the company  predicted adjusted profit of $1.20 to $1.25 per share.

The accounting charges KAR excludes are for excess depreciation and amortization, as well as stock compensation for executives, which are the result of the 2007 purchase of the company by a group of private equity firms.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. what Steve is doing and if he is on another radio station. That is the station I will listen to.

  2. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  3. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  4. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  5. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

ADVERTISEMENT