IBJNews

Slower sales curb results at Adesa parent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Slower auto sales caused KAR Auction Services Inc. to fall short of Wall Street’s third-quarter expectations, the Carmel-based company announced Thursday morning.

The company also lowered its profit forecast for the year.

KAR, which operates Adesa auto auction facilities, had net income of $32.2 million in the three months ended Sept. 30, a 26-percent increase from the same quarter a year earlier.

But, after accounting adjustments, the company suffered a 16-percent decline in its adjusted earnings, from $38.6 million in the third quarter last year to $32.4 million this year.

On a per-share basis, KAR’s adjusted profit slid from 28 cents in the third quarter a year ago to 23 cents this year. Wall Street analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected KAR to earn 28 cents per share.

The big culprit was auto auction sales, which fell nearly 10 percent, to $241.3 million. KAR’s overall revenue, which also includes results of its auto salvage and dealer financing operations, totaled $447 million, up slightly from a year earlier.

Analysts were expecting revenue of nearly $455 million, according to Thomson Reuters.

KAR dropped its full-year profit forecast, excluding accounting items, to $1.18 to $1.20 per share. In August, the company  predicted adjusted profit of $1.20 to $1.25 per share.

The accounting charges KAR excludes are for excess depreciation and amortization, as well as stock compensation for executives, which are the result of the 2007 purchase of the company by a group of private equity firms.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT