IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: In 'Smoke on the Mountain,' Sanders family shines

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Two years ago, Beef & Boards scored an unexpected (for me, at least) season highlight with “Smoke on the Mountain,” a surface-simple collection of old-time gospel tunes, backwoods testifying and affectionate family comedy.

Last year, it scored a not-unexpected season highlight by bringing back the exact same cast for “Smoke on the Mountain: Homecoming,” which actually was the third in the “Smoke” series.

Why skip the second? Because, the slot open in the schedule was mid-summer. And the second show is “Sanders Family Christmas.”

This summer, having run out of other smoking options, B&B opted to throw seasonal sensibilities to the wind and revisit the Sanders family with its holiday show.

“Christmas,” it turns out, isn’t quite the show the others are. The tunes aren’t as memorably rendered. Uncle Stanley (Jayson Elliott), the outsider of the first play, seems neutered by the writers this time out. And, overall, there’s less urgency to the already thin plotting—odd, considering the potential gravitas of the World War II time period. The war is acknowledged—and seeing Mom Sanders (Lynne Perkins) wordlessly watch her enlisted son preach is one of the show’s most moving moments—but it takes a backseat, especially in the second act, to lighthearted singing and clowning.

Old home month: Most of the playing-their-own-instruments cast of Beef & Boards’ current show, “A Sanders Family Christmas,” played the same roles in its two previous “Smoke on the Mountain” musicals. (Photo Courtesy Beef & Boards)


The previous shows’ cast hasn’t all made it back. Laura Goins as star-struck sister Denise joins Perkins as the newcomers, and, while both are fine, there is some adjustment time needed for those of us who saw and loved the previous productions. Kind of like getting used to the “new” Becky on “Roseanne” or, to an earlier generation, dealing with the “Bewitched” Darren switcheroo.

They, and the rest of the cast, still gamely play their own instruments. Bob Payne once again grounds the show, in a good way, as father Burl, although his monologue feels incomplete this time. Andrew Ross gets better and better each year as the awkwardly strong son Dennis. And, at the risk of repeating what I’ve said in previous years, Sarah Hund and John Vessels as talent-free sister June and her smitten beau, Rev. Mervin Oglethorpe, are magical. Their play-ending scene—beautiful, funny and true—is theater to be cherished. They help to prove that even a lesser Sanders-family production is better than just about anything else out there.
__________

 If I wanted to be as snarkily obnoxious as the sometimes narrator of Nicholas Wardigo’s “The Dos and Don’ts of Time Travel,” I might dismiss the Phoenix Theatre’s production of the play with one simple word. Don’t.

A grad student allegedly—but never believably—writing a paper on the topic of time-travel movies, Rachel is a character whose ideas don’t get much more academic than “It sucks.” Yet Wardigo’s ideas don’t get much deeper, either.

In the barely more than 80-minute piece, Rachel (played with uphill-battle charm by Sara Riemen) has got a pal, Zoey (Kelli Johnson and Sarah M. Grant—yes, both of them), who, coincidentally, discovers she can travel through time. A kind of bookend to “Octopus,” the previous Phoenix offering, “Dos and Don’ts” also concerns a homosexual couple wrestling with issues of commitment. Both plays take supernatural turns. Both ultimately peel away their theatrical devices in an effort to hit core, human truths. In both cases, the heart is in the right place.

While I wasn’t enthusiastic about the former play, it’s integration of solid design, lighting and special effects upgraded a wandering script and inconsistent performances. In “Dos and Don’ts,” the most compelling element is Zach Rosing’s circular videography, offering a constant distraction from dialogue that rarely rings true and obfuscation standing in for the enigmatic. The result, on a well-attended Thursday night, felt like a stretched Fringe Fest entry.

Frankly, I had a much more thought-provoking time watching most of the movies Rachel trashes. “Time After Time” anyone?•

 __________

Visit ibj.com/arts for additional reviews, previews and arts discussion. Twitter: IBJarts

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT