IBJNews

Indy Chamber of Commerce endorses smoking ban

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce is throwing its weight behind a tougher workplace smoking ban up for consideration Monday night by the City-County Council.

Support from the business group could help seal passage for the ordinance, which has divided the council. The measure would expand an existing smoking ban by prohibiting lighting up in bars, bowling alleys and nightclubs, along with nearby outdoor seating areas.

City-County Councilor Angela Mansfield, a Democrat, is co-sponsoring the proposal along with Republican Ben Hunter. Supporters say the ban is an obvious way to improve public health, while opponents argue business owners should decide for themselves whether to allow smoking.

Chamber President Roland Dorson said his group's rationale for supporting the ban goes beyond public health, to economic development. People and businesses considering a move to Indianapolis consider quality-of-life matters, including smoking bans.

"One of the ingredients to creating a fantastic place is a demonstrated concern for public health," Dorson said.

Indianapolis first passed a smoke-free workplace ordinance in 2005. At the time, the Chamber received feedback for and against the proposal, Dorson said. This time, they've heard only from supporters.

"We’ll take a leadership role on this,"  he said. "It would be great if it passed in its current form."

The existing law, which took effect in March 2006, prohibits smoking in public workplaces, but has exceptions for bars, taverns, bowling alleys, private clubs with liquor licenses, and businesses that don't allow patrons younger than 18.

An amendment to the new proposal would still allow smoking in cigar and hookah bars, but it would cap the number of licenses available for such establishments.

If the city votes to remove some of the exceptions, it would follow the lead of a couple of surrounding communities that have strengthened smoking ordinances in recent months. In May, Franklin passed one of the most restrictive bans in the state, covering all enclosed workplaces and public places, including bars. And, in September, the town of Westfield adopted a smoking ban that covers most public places, but excluded taverns that don't allow patrons under 21.

To take IBJ's unscientific poll on the smoking ban, click here.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Never again
    I used to come downtown a lot for dinner, entertainment and such. I will never come to Indianapolis again. Do you understand that now, you cannot walk on the sidewalk in Indianapolis and smoke because you will always be with in 25 feet of a building . You cannot walk around the Cirle,and smoke, if you do, you wil be arrested.

    Bad move Chamber, Im noty alone, you just took money out of your members pockets. I will go to Hamilton county to spend my money.

    It's just a metter of time , they will be in our homes telling us what to eat, what to wear and what to THINK.

    This is going to cost the members of the Chamber a lot of money. Less money, less taxes.get the picture. Welcome to the Socialist State of Indiana.



    ENOUGH GOVERNMENT IN MY LIFE
  • sorry
    for the typo
  • What he didn't say
    Was that gocernment had to do it for them..
  • Well Said
    Thomas Jefferson:

    I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors
    • Falling behind
      What gov't buildings can you smoke in?? That doesn't sound right. It is a joke to think that we will be one of the last states to pass a state-wide comprehensive smoking ban - why are we so far behind?
    • Fingers Crossed!
      No one's trying to treat anything like a narcotic...that's laughable and you should be ashamed of yourself! I am excited that maybe someone in the near future I can leave work and not be congested and sick for 2 days or my friends can leave our fine establishment and not smell like an ash tray!
    • Smoking will be illegal soon
      I agree with Joe - this is just one step along a chain that will eventually outlaw smoking and treat it like a narcotic drug. While I think the cigarette habit is disgusting and harmful, the recent laws go a bit too far in my opinion. Banning from smoking in bars? Lame.
    • Government Involvement
      While I'm a Chamber member, I don't agree with this. These are the same people that complain when government gets involved in their business....unless they need a bailout. I'm not a smoker but believe the market should dictate the decision to allow tobacco use.
    • Open Season
      Ok, I quit smoking about 6 years ago, it's a smelly, dirty and most recently, expensive habit.
      But can't we just have an ordinance where if we find people smoking we could just shoot them? We've got smoking out of most place, let's just shoot them and get them out of their misery.
      When someone talks about incremental government regulations, this example will come to mind. Liquor is next, then fat people. Get your guns and ammo ready should be a great hunting season.
    • Ban smoking - Government is a Business too!
      I am not a smoker, but if everyone is concerned about second hand smoke and how non smokers are affected, then all government buildings should be included. It is discriminating that that law makers allow themselves the ability to smoke at work inside and/or outside. They should be included in the law making process too!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    ADVERTISEMENT