Health advocates will have to live with wide exemptions in a proposed statewide smoking ban because a stricter, more comprehensive
ban wouldn't be able to pass the conservative Senate, the head of a Senate committee said.
Sen. Ron Alting, R- Lafayette, said the bill has its best shot in years of passing because of exemptions for casinos, bars,
clubs and even nursing homes.
"When I got elected 13 years ago, the advocates that want all or nothing are still here 13 years later with nothing,"
Alting said.
But health advocates told the Senate Public Policy Committee that Alting chairs that they wanted a more comprehensive smoking
ban that would protect all workers, even those who work in casinos and bars.
Alice Curry of Columbus said she was diagnosed in 2009 with stage 4 lung cancer despite having never smoked and not having
a family history of cancer. She wonders if time spent years ago in smoky teachers' lounges and sales offices contributed
to the cancer and told lawmakers on the committee they have a responsibility to protect workers.
"Every person working and living in Indiana needs your help or they're going to end up fighting the battle that
I'm fighting right now," she said, wiping away tears. "Every worker in Indiana should have the ability to work
in a job that doesn't make them sick, or worse, kill them — especially when we know how to avoid it."
The Senate committee didn't vote on the proposal Wednesday, and Alting said he'll decide later whether to take a
vote after talking to advocates.
Bill sponsor Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, said he wants something passed this year but wants at least some of the exemptions
removed.
"I am still hopeful that we can eliminate a couple of those exemptions," Brown said.
Removing the exemptions could complicate the legislation, however, because of a boycott by House Democrats. Any amended bill
would have to go back to the House for approval, and if Democrats remain out long term that could jeopardize the bill.
Brown said he didn't think the walkout made it more difficult for him to shepherd the legislation through the General
Assembly, and Alting welcomed Brown back to the Statehouse at the committee meeting Wednesday.
Sen. Brent Waltz, R-Greenwood, did criticize Brown for the boycott, saying that the walkout could cause some bills to die,
including one of his that he considers important. He said the Senate was dealing with Brown's bill, but that so many other
bills "will languish and very likely fail because of the actions of you and your colleagues in the House."
Brown said Democrats believe they are sticking up for their constituents.
The exemptions for casinos and horse racing tracks was approved by the House after the nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency
said banning smoking there could cost the cash-strapped state about $190 million a year. The House later voted to exempt bars
that only admit adults over age 21 after some lawmakers argued that it was unfair to exempt casinos and tracks without exempting
bars, because bars located near casinos could lose business if smokers decided to hang out at casinos instead of at bars.
Exemptions for nursing homes and fraternal clubs were also added to appease those who said veterans and those living in nursing
homes should have the right to smoke in certain areas.
Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels said he'd sign a statewide smoking ban into law if legislators approve it.

















IBJ Conversations
19 Comments
Add Comment
The type of person who does not believe that smoking causes cancer is the same type of person who believes that global warming is a conspiracy, Barack Obama is from Kenya, and that there is some secret society running the Vatican and the US government.
Sounds like too much glen beck or late night talk radio to me.
Let's act as educated rational humans, decide that something as gross as smoking is not worth the costs, and get it out of all places open to public patronage.
Do you know that family history has as much or more determination on lung cancer as smoking does??
Do you know that an obese male below the age of 70 (which would include approx. 1/3 of all Americans) , is at least THREE TIMES more likely to develop lung cancer, as an active smoker is??
Do you know that the World Health Organization (in a study they tried to hide), found no statistically significant link between second hand smoke, and lung cancer - and in fact found that children who grew up in a smoking household, had a 22% less chance of developing lung cancer?? - no wonder they tried to hide it - they didn't want to announce THAT to the world!! How in the world could the anti-smoking movement get started, if that was known!!
Did you know that, despite almost 20 years of a smoking ban in California (along with the persecution, and ridicule that has accompanied it), - shows the EXACT SAME 5 year drop in lung cancer incidence, as Idaho had - when they had NO BANS AT ALL! - and that drop was only SLIGHTLY more than Indiana - who has TWICE as many smokers?
Do you know that a recent study found a gene they believe is responsible, for some people not being able to quit smoking - no matter what they try!!
These statistics, and studies are available to anyone - and you WILL find them If You care enough to look
When Kansas passed the smoking ban last year, 590,000 people became "second class citizens" - With no rights to an ENJOYABLE social life!
And the fear of arrest, if CAUGHT trying to ENJOY it!
But That is NOTHING Compared to California - where a MINIMUM of 3.7 MILLION people have to HIDE in their houses,- because they can't even go OUTSIDE and have a cigarette!!
Like I said before folks WAKE UP! In the U.S. there are 64.76 MILLION Smokers - Who are being TAXED higher Than ANYONE else around us - So that (at least a portion of) this tax money can go to these groups to take away EVEN MORE of our rights!!
But the movement has evolved into something TOTALLY different - Now stating that "SMOKERS ARE GUILTY OF CAPITAL CRIMES" which was (until recently) published on the front page of the A.S.H. website! They have been fully convinced that we should be killed - ONLY because we are smokers.
If you don't see the correlation between them and Hitlers Germany, Then it's TIME TO WAKE UP!
To show this further:
John Banzhaf, you can see who he is here; http://banzhafwatch.org/ - the founder, and undisputed "Voice" of ASH (Action Against Smoking an Health) and the group that most of the Anti's get there info from, made a statement in the 1980's, claiming that "ALL THEY WANTED" was separate smoking sections, that's all, just separate smoking sections. He went on to say, "We don't care if people want to smoke in their offices, or even in hospital rooms, IT'S THEIR RIGHT TO SMOKE."
This is THE VERY SAME MAN who today states: that
......smokers are guilty of CAPITAL crimes.
......THAT SMOKERS HAVE NO RIGHTS!
..... SMOKERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT CHILDREN
and that PEOPLE WHO SMOKE WITH CHILDREN IN CARS - ARE KILLING THEM!
He has been called - a "Sleazy, ambulance chasing lawyer", who sells CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT KITS, to anyone who wants to start a lawsuit - AGAINST ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH SMOKING!
If you have tried the link I posted above; you will also learn that he is also intrumental in start of all the TRASH LAWSUITS TO SUE THE FAST FOOD JOINTS - FOR MAKING YOUR KIDS FAT!
THIS IS THE WHOLE "BACKBONE" BEHIND THE ANTI-SMOKING MOVEMENT ! THIS IS WHERE THEIR PHILOSOPHY COMES FROM!
Thus, if a restaurant owner is willing to open as a sole proprietorship, then he recieves no protection from the state. If he wishes to allow smoking, so be it. If, however, he recieves protection from the state, he should be required to give up certain "rights", including the "right" to allow smoking on his property.
And even if we don't put it into the corporation laws, putting it in the liquor laws seems reasonable. If a proprietor wants authorization to sell alcohol (which is, by the way, a government grant that is Constitutional) then he must surrender his right to allow smoking on his property. He is recieving something from the state (the license) and must surrender something in return. This is all constitutional under the state's police power to protect the health and well-being of its citizens.
I cant believe that a bunch of addicts get to dictate what the rest of the population has to deal with.
Smoking causes cancer, smells bad, and should be discouraged as much as possible. Period.
Raise tobacco taxes, ban it in bars, and fund anti smoking ads.
Come on Indiana, think of the future. Cancer is not going away with out fixing some major problems.