IBJNews

Smulyan considering another option to take Emmis private

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. CEO Jeff Smulyan is considering an "alternative structure" for his bid to take the company private after facing opposition from a group of preferred shareholders attempting to block the deal.

The Indianapolis-based radio and magazine company postponed a decision on the deal Tuesday night after it failed to receive enough votes from shareholders, either in person or by proxy, to reach a quorum. It will convene another shareholders’ meeting at 6:30 p.m. Friday.

As the $2.40-per-share offer stands, Smulyan needs two-thirds of preferred shareholders to OK a change in the company's articles of incorporation for the the deal to proceed. Preferred shareholders also must agree to convert their shares into bonds—at 60 cents on the dollar—in exchange for an attractive interest rate of 12 percent. 

Last month, eight firms that hold Emmis’ preferred stock banded together to prevent the sale. Collectively they hold 38 percent of Emmis’ preferred shares.

Although the company did not disclose details, it said in a news release that Smulyan is continuing to negotiate with the preferred shareholders and is considering other avenues, including an option that would not require their consent.

Still, “there can be no assurance that either an agreement will be reached with the group of holders of preferred stock or that an alternative structure can be implemented,” Emmis said in the release.

A majority of common shareholders also would have to approve the buyout.

Emmis stock opened Wednesday morning at $1.60 and soared nearly 29 percent, to $2.06, by late morning, stirring optimism that a deal could get done despite the delay.

Smulyan, through his JS Acquisition Inc. and New York private equity firm Alden Global Capital, has offered $2.40 per common share, a bid that valued the company at about $90 million.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in seven cities, including Indianapolis Monthly. It also operates radio stations in Slovakia and Bulgaria.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT