Failed bid to take Emmis private costing millions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. CEO Jeff Smulyan’s JS Acquisition LLC has racked up expenses and fees of about $10.2 million in its attempt to take the Indianapolis-based media company private.

The figure, included in a public filing, is sure to grow as the $5.5 million legal bill escalates. On Wednesday, JS Acquisition sued its one-time financier, Alden Global Capital, for backing out of the deal.

Smulyan didn’t dispute the amount when asked about it Thursday morning.

“I would say that’s in the ballpark,” he said. “There’s a tremendous amount of fees.”

Attorneys filed a breach of contract claim against three Alden Global Capital units in Marion Superior Court, saying the going-private transaction failed when Alden changed course after months of negotiations with a group of preferred shareholders—costing JS Acquisition “significant” fees and other expenses.

JS Acquisition is represented by the Indianapolis office of Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP.

Alden and JS Acquisition, a private company formed by Smulyan to complete the buyout, agreed in April to take Emmis private. But, in July, nine dissident investors—holding a combined 38 percent of the company’s preferred shares—emerged to block the $90 million deal.

They balked at Smulyan’s initial offer to convert their holdings into bonds worth only 60 percent of the value of the shares, but paying an interest rate nearly double the 6.25 percent the shareholders currently enjoy.

Negotiations among the three groups began in late July, the lawsuit said, and by Aug. 5 the preferred shareholders had agreed to a sweetened offer that increased the bonds to 77.5 percent of the share value and adjusted the interest rate by an undisclosed amount.

The lawsuit said Alden confirmed the terms of the new agreement on Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, then rejected the modifications on Aug. 20. A few days later, according to the suit, Alden principal Randy Smith told JS Acquisition that a “precipitous” drop in radio-industry assets made the deal unattractive.

Alden acknowledged in a public filing that it participated in negotiations to revise the original terms of the offer, “to a limited extent.” But Alden maintained in the filing that the more generous terms would leave JS Acquisition overleveraged and “unattractive” to Alden.

Smulyan disputed Alden’s allegations.

“We don’t agree that is the reason they backed out,” he said while declining to elaborate. “While the stock has declined, all the metrics since the deal was announced got better, not worse.”

Emmis shares have declined in value by about 15 percent since the April going-private announcement, trading Thursday morning at $1.05 each. Shares were down about 5 percent when the preferred shareholders first raised objections.

Smulyan, however, remains bullish on Emmis, saying the performance of both its radio and publishing divisions are improving.

For its fiscal year ending Feb. 28, Emmis expects revenue of $253.6 million, a 4.5-percent increase over its previous fiscal year.

“The worst of the economy is over, and I also think the perception of traditional media was overstated—the perception that it was dead and gone and buried,” he said.

For its first fiscal quarter ended May 31, Emmis lost $3.9 million, or 10 cents a share, compared with a profit of $11.9 million, or 32 cents a share, in the same period last year. Revenue increased 1 percent, to $60.3 million. Results of the second quarter, which ended Aug. 31, have yet to be released.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Indianapolis-based Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines, including Indianapolis Monthly, in seven cities. It also operates radio stations in Slovakia and Bulgaria.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?