IBJNews

Failed bid to take Emmis private costing millions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. CEO Jeff Smulyan’s JS Acquisition LLC has racked up expenses and fees of about $10.2 million in its attempt to take the Indianapolis-based media company private.

The figure, included in a public filing, is sure to grow as the $5.5 million legal bill escalates. On Wednesday, JS Acquisition sued its one-time financier, Alden Global Capital, for backing out of the deal.

Smulyan didn’t dispute the amount when asked about it Thursday morning.

“I would say that’s in the ballpark,” he said. “There’s a tremendous amount of fees.”

Attorneys filed a breach of contract claim against three Alden Global Capital units in Marion Superior Court, saying the going-private transaction failed when Alden changed course after months of negotiations with a group of preferred shareholders—costing JS Acquisition “significant” fees and other expenses.

JS Acquisition is represented by the Indianapolis office of Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP.

Alden and JS Acquisition, a private company formed by Smulyan to complete the buyout, agreed in April to take Emmis private. But, in July, nine dissident investors—holding a combined 38 percent of the company’s preferred shares—emerged to block the $90 million deal.

They balked at Smulyan’s initial offer to convert their holdings into bonds worth only 60 percent of the value of the shares, but paying an interest rate nearly double the 6.25 percent the shareholders currently enjoy.

Negotiations among the three groups began in late July, the lawsuit said, and by Aug. 5 the preferred shareholders had agreed to a sweetened offer that increased the bonds to 77.5 percent of the share value and adjusted the interest rate by an undisclosed amount.

The lawsuit said Alden confirmed the terms of the new agreement on Aug. 6 and Aug. 7, then rejected the modifications on Aug. 20. A few days later, according to the suit, Alden principal Randy Smith told JS Acquisition that a “precipitous” drop in radio-industry assets made the deal unattractive.

Alden acknowledged in a public filing that it participated in negotiations to revise the original terms of the offer, “to a limited extent.” But Alden maintained in the filing that the more generous terms would leave JS Acquisition overleveraged and “unattractive” to Alden.

Smulyan disputed Alden’s allegations.

“We don’t agree that is the reason they backed out,” he said while declining to elaborate. “While the stock has declined, all the metrics since the deal was announced got better, not worse.”

Emmis shares have declined in value by about 15 percent since the April going-private announcement, trading Thursday morning at $1.05 each. Shares were down about 5 percent when the preferred shareholders first raised objections.

Smulyan, however, remains bullish on Emmis, saying the performance of both its radio and publishing divisions are improving.

For its fiscal year ending Feb. 28, Emmis expects revenue of $253.6 million, a 4.5-percent increase over its previous fiscal year.

“The worst of the economy is over, and I also think the perception of traditional media was overstated—the perception that it was dead and gone and buried,” he said.

For its first fiscal quarter ended May 31, Emmis lost $3.9 million, or 10 cents a share, compared with a profit of $11.9 million, or 32 cents a share, in the same period last year. Revenue increased 1 percent, to $60.3 million. Results of the second quarter, which ended Aug. 31, have yet to be released.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Indianapolis-based Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines, including Indianapolis Monthly, in seven cities. It also operates radio stations in Slovakia and Bulgaria.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT