IBJNews

Solar panel maker Abound to auction off assets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Abound Solar Inc., the bankrupt solar-panel maker that had hoped to hire up to 1,200 people in Indiana by the end of next year, will have its assets sold at auctions this month and in October under authority granted last week by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware.

Colorado-based Abound filed for Chapter 7 liquidation in early July and a trustee was appointed. The company listed assets of $136.1 million and debt totaling $82 million.

Abound's ambitious plan to open major solar panel plants in Colorado and Indiana was undone by stiff competition from companies in China, where the government spent more than $30 billion in 2010 to subsidize its solar industry, according to U.S. energy officials.

The company had hoped to use the massive, unused Getrag transmission plant in Tipton, north of Indianapolis, for a plant with 900 to 1,200 employees. But the plant never opened and the Colorado operations barely got off the ground.

Abound borrowed about $70 million from a $400 million loan guarantee provided by the U.S. Energy Department. The last draw on the loan was in August 2011, about the time Solyndra LLC halted manufacturing in advance of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. A spokesman for the Energy Department previously said the government expects a loss of $40 million to $60 million on the loan guarantee.

The assets of the company will be auctioned by a joint venture between Great American Group LLC and Branford Group. They will receive expense reimbursement up to $156,000 plus a fee of 60 percent of the so-called buyer’s premium. If the assets are sold in bulk rather than piecemeal, the fee will be 5 percent of the gross sale price.

The 781,000-square-foot plant in Tipton where Abound had hoped to open its Indiana plant has gone back on the market at a steep discount.








 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT