IBJNews

Some big bills on back burner in Indiana Legislature

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three weeks into Indiana's legislative session, Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma is touting the hard work already being done on major issues. Not surprisingly, Democratic House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer contends the session is off to a slow start.

Actually, they're both right.

Some big issues — including a fix for the state's insolvent unemployment fund and a contentious plan to use taxpayer money to help parents send their children to private school — have yet to be discussed in committee meetings.

But lawmakers are working quickly to advance other bills. Lawmakers have fast-tracked a bill that would expand the use of centralized vote centers, an effort to help counties that want to use vote centers instead of traditional neighborhood precincts in the May municipal primaries. Legislative committees have also approved bills to ban texting while driving and outlaw smoking in public places other than casinos and horse racing tracks. Both bills have been proposed in years past but seem to have more momentum this year.

Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said committee chairmen have "conducted some very positive discussions on critical issues that are before our state and our General Assembly."

"They are doing precisely what we've asked — to have full and fair committee hearings," Bosma said.

But Bauer, D-South Bend, questioned why lawmakers aren't focusing more time on efforts to create jobs.

"We have gotten off to a very slow start," he said.

Some complex bills — such as a new, two-year state budget — always move through the legislative process at a snail's pace. The House Ways and Means Committee that begins the legislative budgeting process has begun holding hearings, listening to funding requests from state agencies and universities. Those meetings will stretch into early February, but final budget negotiations won't take place until the legislative session nears its end in late April. Lawmakers won't approve a budget until after they receive updated predictions of state revenue, which usually occurs in mid-April.

Redistricting is also on the back burner for now as lawmakers await 2010 Census data — expected to arrive in February at the earliest — that will help them redraw maps for the state's nine congressional and 150 state legislative districts. Those maps will stand for the next decade. Republicans will control the process because they have the majority in both the Indiana House and Senate.

While the big-ticket items wait, lawmakers are keeping busy hashing out the details of plenty of controversial bills. A Senate committee plans a Feb. 2 hearing on an immigration proposal that would require police to ask for proof of citizenship or immigration status if they have a reasonable suspicion that a person is in the country illegally. A proposal to fix the state's unemployment fund — which pays out millions more in jobless benefits than it takes in from employers — will get a hearing in a House committee Tuesday.

The House Education Committee is expected to vote Monday to approve a plan that aims to create more charter schools, a move pushed by GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels but opposed by some education leaders who say the proposal will siphon money away from traditional public schools. And the Senate Education Committee is slated to vote Wednesday on Daniels' proposal to give a $3,500 scholarship to high school students who graduate a year early.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Immigration laws
    Let's just take all them off the books then Rick since you say their unenforceable. But you don't get it. Do you pay taxes? Then you already feed (food stamps) & house (public housing vouchers) them. Plus you pay for their healthcare when they show up in the emergency room and can't pay for all the expensive services they receive for free.

    Yeah Rick (& Sandy), let's just not change anything and keep paying for what we already are...smart thinking.

    Solve the illegal immigration problem by taking away their opportunities and make them conform to American culture, language, and values and they'll either strive to do it the right way, legally, or go away all by themselves.
  • I agree with Rick
    Did those wackos in the legislature notice that huge convention center remodeling project that was just completed a block south of the state capitol? The convention center is concerned that our lack of a tough non-smoking ban could affect their ability to fill the expanded convention center. So, by all means, letÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢s do something thatÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢ll be sure and kill other potential convention business with a upid, an unenforceable anti-immigration bill.

    By the way, how many of those hateful legislators are Native Americans?
  • immigration? really?
    Do we think we are Arizona or something? What a waste of time and resources. If somebody is here illegally, who's going to pay to feed, house and deport them? We are - what a waste.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT