St. Francis sues OrthoIndy over new surgery center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers has sued three physicians affiliated with OrthoIndy over the group's new $20 million Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, scheduled to open in Greenwood next year. The complaint alleges the new facility breaches a partnership deal struck in 2001.

According to St. Francis’ civil complaint, filed Dec. 18 in Hamilton County Superior Court, St. Francis and Ol South LLC, an OrthoIndy affiliate, in 2001 agreed to become equal partners in another facility — the Indiana Orthopaedic Surgery Center at 5255 E. Stop 11 Road on the St. Francis campus.

“We’re surprised and disappointed St. Francis has sued three of our doctors," said OrthoIndy’s attorney, David Herzog, a partner with Indianapolis-based Baker & Daniels LLP. "We believe the suit has no merit, and we intend to defend it vigorously.”

Owned by physicians practicing in pain management, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery and anesthesia, the Indiana Orthopaedic Surgery Center opened in spring 2005. According to St. Francis’ complaint, its profit exceeded $8 million in 2007 and 2008. Its managers included OrthoIndy physicians Dr. Scott Gudeman, Dr. Robert Falender and Dr. H. Jeffery Whitaker.

OI South merged into OrthoIndy’s Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital in July 2007. St. Francis alleges that in December 2008 it learned, via a press release, that Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital had purchased property four miles from the Indiana Orthopaedic Surgery Center and planned to construct a competing 75,000-square-foot surgery center and clinic. St. Francis claims it was never advised about Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital’s plans, which it argues violate their earlier deal.

On Dec. 23, St. Francis CEO Robert Brody sent an internal e-mail to all St. Francis physicians explaining the situation. In it, Brody said the lawsuit alleges a breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud on the part of OrthoIndy. It seeks both compensatory and punitive damages resulting from a criminal conspiracy and breach of contract.

“We have made numerous attempts to discuss, and resolve, the situation with OrthoIndy leadership,” Brody wrote. “To date, they have failed to engage in constructive dialogue regarding their plans to construct the competing facility. In fact, they continue to forge ahead in the process, despite the ramifications to patients and their partnership with St. Francis. OrthoIndy broke ground on their planned facility three months ago and it is expected to be completed in spring 2010.”

“We have reluctantly, but justifiably, chosen the only option available to us at this juncture.”

According to an OrthoIndy press release, the new Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital will be located at 1260 Innovation Parkway in Greenwood. It will feature 42 exam rooms, four operating rooms, physical therapy and MRI services as well as 21 OrthoIndy physicians. It was designed by Indianapolis-based BSA LifeStructures. Fishers-based Meyer Najem is the project’s construction manager. Indianapolis-based Hokanson Cos. Inc. and McCormack Development are also affiliated with the project.


  • Software
    buy Lytec it will increase your efficiency by utilizing medical management software services such as: electronic insurance filing, electronic patient statements, real time electronic insurance verification, electronic prescriptions, patient web portal and electronic EOB posting.
  • cherry pickers
    OrthoIndy cherry picks the high-profit cases and sends the low margin cases on to their "partners" like St. Vs and St. Francis. They basically turn away government plan members. I think this is what St. Francis is more worried about n terms of what this will mean for them with this new build.
    It's high time someone exposed OrthoIndy and their practices!
  • and your point is....
    With regard to Dr. Gudeman is involved...
    What point are you attempting to make?
  • An expert in one area..
    ...just because someone excels at their medical practice does not necessarily mean they conduct their business practices are at the same level.
  • Dr. Gudeman
    Dr. Gudeman is the best!
  • interesting
    Scott Gudeman is involved

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.